BIDS Approach to Understanding Intelligence

There is nothing really the matter with the concept of g; it is just that we have misused it by making it the omnipresent concept in our study of cognitive abilities. Intelligence is important on three levels, namely, brain physiology, individual differences, and social trends (collectively, BIDS). The core of a BIDS approach to intelligence is that each of those levels has its own organizing concept, and it is a mistake to impose the architectonic concept of one level on another. We have to realize that intelligence can act like a highly correlated set of abilities on one level and act like a set of functionally independent abilities on other levels.

Take the brain. Highly localized neural clusters are developed differentially as a result of specialized cognitive exercise, but there are also important factors that affect all neural clusters such as blood supply, dopamine as a substance that renders synapses receptive to registering experience, and the input of the stress-response system. When we map the brain’s structure, we find a mixture of commonality and neural decentralization. The commonality may well give rise to g on the individual differences level, while the decentralization leads to the phenomenon of various cognitive skills developing independently over time.

Notes:

Intelligence is a Network of Factors.

Folksonomies: intelligence g-factor

Taxonomies:
/health and fitness/disease/cancer/brain tumor (0.570912)
/science/computer science/artificial intelligence (0.425784)
/finance/personal finance/insurance/health insurance (0.405939)

Keywords:
individual differences (0.997450 (neutral:0.000000)), functionally independent abilities (0.996777 (positive:0.878307)), highly correlated set (0.942709 (positive:0.878307)), various cognitive skills (0.925222 (neutral:0.000000)), neural clusters (0.923030 (neutral:0.000000)), individual differences level (0.863526 (neutral:0.000000)), omnipresent concept (0.751337 (negative:-0.403722)), cognitive abilities (0.719642 (negative:-0.403722)), architectonic concept (0.719448 (negative:-0.650165)), neural decentralization (0.694333 (negative:-0.293915)), organizing concept (0.682336 (neutral:0.000000)), cognitive exercise (0.625435 (neutral:0.000000)), social trends (0.614664 (neutral:0.000000)), BIDS (0.612869 (positive:0.504615)), intelligence (0.608487 (positive:0.548456)), Intelligence Intelligence (0.604800 (positive:0.504615)), brain physiology (0.595257 (neutral:0.000000)), blood supply (0.576856 (neutral:0.000000)), important factors (0.565836 (neutral:0.000000)), levels (0.432240 (positive:0.592297)), commonality (0.429174 (negative:-0.293915)), synapses (0.307069 (negative:-0.484262)), dopamine (0.306380 (negative:-0.484262)), mistake (0.305368 (negative:-0.650165)), Network (0.282874 (positive:0.504615)), mixture (0.281114 (negative:-0.293915)), matter (0.280597 (negative:-0.407752)), phenomenon (0.279050 (neutral:0.000000)), study (0.276745 (negative:-0.403722)), result (0.275517 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
Network of Factors:Organization (0.811367 (positive:0.504615)), dopamine:Drug (0.653819 (negative:-0.484262))

Concepts:
Cognition (0.953300): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Brain (0.939306): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Psychology (0.781824): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Neuron (0.722855): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Mind (0.607500): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Nervous system (0.535840): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Perception (0.516501): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Object (0.507260): dbpedia | freebase

 Shattering Intelligence: Implications for Education and Interventions
Electronic/World Wide Web>Internet Article:  Flynn, James R. (November 5, 2007), Shattering Intelligence: Implications for Education and Interventions, CATO Unbound, Retrieved on 2015-05-26
  • Source Material [www.cato-unbound.org]
  • Folksonomies: intelligence plasticity


    Schemas

    26 MAY 2015

     The <em>g</em>-factor Paradox

    If IQ is heavily influenced by genes, then how do we explain the Flynn effect? Either we are improperly quantifying g or improperly measuring environmental factors.
    Folksonomies: intelligence iq g-factor
    Folksonomies: intelligence iq g-factor
     10