The Tyranny of the Written Word

Nevertheless, almost everybody speaks better than he writes. (This also applies to authors.) Writing is a highly formalized technique which, in purely physiological terms, demands a peculiarly rigid bodily posture. To this there corresponds the high degree of social specialization that it demands. Professional writers have always tended to think in caste terms. The class character of their work is unquestionable, even in the age of universal compulsory education. The whole process is extraordinarily beset with taboos. Spelling mistakes, which are completely immaterial in terms of communication, are punished by the social disqualification of the writer. The rules that govern this technique have a normative power attributed to them for which there is no rational basis. Intimidation through the written word has remained a widespread and class-specific phenomenon even in advanced industrial societies.

These alienating factors cannot be eradicated from written literature. They are reinforced by the methods by which society transmits its writing techniques. While people learn to speak very early, and mostly in psychologically favorable conditions, learning to write forms an important part of authoritarian socialization by the school (

Notes:

How absurd, nonsensical writing and grammar rules push people out of expressing themselves in a medium that is purely a monologue anyway.

Folksonomies: phonetics

Taxonomies:
/art and entertainment/books and literature (0.578396)
/hobbies and interests/getting published/freelance writing (0.577285)
/science/social science/philosophy/ethics (0.448585)

Keywords:
rigid bodily posture (0.919083 (negative:-0.492553)), highly formalized technique (0.889551 (positive:0.551376)), purely physiological terms (0.877591 (neutral:0.000000)), universal compulsory education (0.850275 (neutral:0.000000)), advanced industrial societies. (0.768422 (negative:-0.570551)), authoritarian socialization (0.535504 (negative:-0.245938)), class-specific phenomenon (0.534611 (negative:-0.570551)), alienating factors (0.529119 (neutral:0.000000)), social disqualification (0.521042 (negative:-0.648011)), caste terms (0.516113 (neutral:0.000000)), high degree (0.510654 (neutral:0.000000)), normative power (0.510288 (negative:-0.346998)), social specialization (0.509746 (neutral:0.000000)), Professional writers (0.501248 (neutral:0.000000)), class character (0.495633 (positive:0.273051)), rational basis (0.487196 (negative:-0.346998)), writing techniques (0.457128 (positive:0.610267)), taboos (0.222192 (negative:-0.714864)), Intimidation (0.216742 (negative:-0.570551)), everybody (0.212417 (positive:0.489214))

Entities:
writer:JobTitle (0.695931 (negative:-0.648011))

Concepts:
Writing (0.947467): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Writer (0.877187): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Sociology (0.853374): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Creative writing (0.618264): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Education (0.570980): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Learning (0.531274): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Communication (0.505856): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Writing system (0.480673): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

 Constituents of a Theory of the Media
Periodicals>Journal Article:  Enzenberger, Hans Magnus (Nov/Dec 1970), Constituents of a Theory of the Media, New Left Review, (64) 13-36, New York, Retrieved on 2010-05-01
  • Source Material [newleftreview.org]
  • Folksonomies: new media


    Schemas

    31 DEC 2010

     Arguments for English Spelling Reform

    This schema is a collection of arguments about how proper grammar, with its illogical and inconsistently applied rules, is used by academics and intellectuals to create a privileged class of people who's ideas deserve considering because they have successfully learned the irrational system.
    Folksonomies: phonetics grammar
    Folksonomies: phonetics grammar
     38