Science Faith
Many religious believers mischaracterize naturalists as people without faith, but that is absurd. Eve^ryone must believe in something—it's part of human nature. I I have no problem acknowledging that 1 have beliefs, though they differ from more traditional kinds of faith. Naturalists must believe, first of all, that the work is understandable and that it knowledge of the world can be obtained through observation, experimentation, and verification. Most scientists don't think much about this point. They simply assume that it is true and get to work. But this assumption has relevance to people other than philosophers. When intelligent design creationists, for example, speak of replacing methodological naturalism in science classes with theistic naturalism, they are threatening to remove this assumption from the shared presuppositions of public discourse.
Greg Graffin, Steve Olson, Anarchy Evolution (2011-10-18)
Notes
Scientists have faith that the world can be understood rationally.
References
- Anarchy Evolution Book
Schemas
Triples
- Scientists Have Faith Similarity from Scientists have Faith
Watson’s reading
Tags generated by IBM Watson from the text. Percentages are its confidence.
Categories
- science 48%
- science social science philosophy 40%
- religion and spirituality 37%
People, places and things
- something—it City
Concepts
Keywords
intelligent design creationists, Science Faith Scientists, methodological naturalism, theistic naturalism, religious believers, human nature, traditional kinds, public discourse, science classes, naturalists, assumption, world
13 more keywords
people, presuppositions, experimentation, relevance, observation, philosophers, speak, verification, example, Eve^ryone, something—it, problem, beliefs