The Question of God is Not Valid to Science
I don’t think you can refute creationism. Science only explores the natural world, not the supernatural world, and God is a supernatural question. Even creationists will admit that God is supernatural.
The question of God is not a question that’s answerable by science because you can’t create an experiment that shows God doesn’t exist. That’s what scientists do. They create experiments to prove the negative. In fact, most of science is failure—failure to prove your hypothesis. If you can’t prove that God doesn’t exist, there’s no way you can prove that God does exist. It’s not a question valid to science.
Notes:
You cannot prove God does or does not exist, and science is concerned with what is provable.
Folksonomies: science religion creationism theology
Taxonomies:
/science (0.845671)
/science/physics/thermodynamics (0.352514)
/business and industrial/biomedical (0.279171)
Keywords:
God (0.935423 (negative:-0.395656)), science (0.823155 (negative:-0.036288)), question (0.750272 (negative:-0.418944)), supernatural question (0.645263 (negative:-0.485365)), supernatural world (0.609979 (negative:-0.309944)), natural world (0.607959 (positive:0.457824)), creationists (0.410523 (negative:-0.476960)), creationism (0.409436 (negative:-0.387852)), negative (0.391195 (negative:-0.680628)), experiments (0.390854 (negative:-0.680628)), scientists (0.390541 (neutral:0.000000)), hypothesis (0.389914 (positive:0.210145)), experiment (0.389685 (neutral:0.000000)), fact (0.382589 (neutral:0.000000)), failure—failure (0.382225 (positive:0.210145))
Concepts:
Science (0.950483): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Theory (0.793764): dbpedia | freebase
Experiment (0.712627): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Supernatural (0.654472): dbpedia | freebase
Nature (0.552851): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Empiricism (0.507668): dbpedia | freebase
Stephen Jay Gould (0.473713): website | dbpedia | freebase | yago
Theology (0.469042): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc