Corollaries on the Probability that a Research Finding is True
- Corollary 1: The smaller the studies conducted in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.
- Corollary 2: The smaller the effect sizes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.
- Corollary 3: The greater the number and the lesser the selection of tested relationships in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.
- Corollary 4: The greater the flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.
- Corollary 5: The greater the financial and other interests and prejudices in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.
- Corollary 6: The hotter a scientific field (with more scientific teams involved), the less likely the research findings are to be true.
John P. A. Ioannidis, Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Notes
Six indicators that detract from the likelihood that a research paper's results are reproducible.
References
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Internet Article
Schemas
Triples
Not related to other memes yet.
Watson’s reading
Tags generated by IBM Watson from the text. Percentages are its confidence.
Categories
- law, govt and politics 31%
- science 18%
- science mathematics statistics 18%
Concepts
Keywords
research findings, scientific field, Corollary, analytical modes, Research Finding, research paper, scientific teams, Corollaries, likelihood, hotter, Probability, prejudices
10 more keywords
indicators, results, flexibility, outcomes, effect, studies, number, selection, relationships, definitions