Scientifically Accurate Movies and Profits

Contact didn't do badly. It earned $171 million worldwide, nearly doubling the ^90-million production budget. But it was also competing with two o considerably more brainless alien-related sci-fi movies, 1997's Men h in Black and 1996's Independence Day, both of which made a great at deal more money ($589 million and $817 million, respectively). And that unfavorable U financial comparison, more than 1 anything else, dramatizes the incredible challenge science faces in Hollywood. If films that strive ^e to balance scientific plausibility with a compelling story line don't succeed at the box office, the road will be tougher tor future efforts. Luckily, scientific stinkers don't necessarily make the biggest fortunes, either. When you compare two dueling volcano movies, the more plausible Dante's Peak and the much less scientifically serious Volcano, the former did more b business ($178 million worldwide) than the latter ($122 million worldwide).

Notes:

Contact didn't do well compared to other, less-scientific films of the summer, but Dante's Peak did better than Volcano.

Folksonomies: science fiction film

Taxonomies:
/art and entertainment/movies and tv/movies (0.600265)
/business and industrial/advertising and marketing/advertising (0.196529)
/science (0.126990)

Keywords:
Scientifically Accurate Movies (0.904608 (positive:0.520265)), dueling volcano movies (0.824141 (neutral:0.000000)), alien-related sci-fi movies (0.818689 (negative:-0.357107)), tougher tor future (0.792519 (neutral:0.000000)), incredible challenge science (0.755254 (positive:0.613981)), compelling story line (0.743188 (neutral:0.000000)), scientifically serious Volcano (0.577667 (negative:-0.415927)), plausible Dante (0.518262 (negative:-0.415927)), Profits Contact (0.512505 (positive:0.520265)), less-scientific films (0.492615 (positive:0.466524)), production budget (0.483144 (negative:-0.416080)), scientific plausibility (0.481153 (neutral:0.000000)), scientific stinkers (0.480463 (negative:-0.388060)), biggest fortunes (0.475566 (negative:-0.388060)), strive ^e (0.467542 (neutral:0.000000)), deal more money (0.462598 (positive:0.465514)), financial comparison (0.450494 (negative:-0.426152)), box office (0.439422 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
Hollywood:City (0.788174 (positive:0.613981)), $122 million:Quantity (0.788174 (neutral:0.000000)), $171 million:Quantity (0.788174 (neutral:0.000000)), $178 million:Quantity (0.788174 (neutral:0.000000)), $589 million:Quantity (0.788174 (neutral:0.000000)), $817 million:Quantity (0.788174 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Science (0.937365): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Film (0.892122): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
English-language films (0.837283): dbpedia
Science fiction (0.831816): dbpedia | freebase
Movie theater (0.777801): website | dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Volcano (0.777741): dbpedia | opencyc | yago
Disaster film (0.665989): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Box office (0.654793): dbpedia | freebase

 Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Mooney, Chris and Kirshenbaum , Sheril (2009-07-13), Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future, Basic Books, Retrieved on 2011-05-28
Folksonomies: politics science skepticism ignorance