Entropy in our Everyday Lives: Active Stability

Because things naturally move to disorder over time, we can position ourselves to create stability. There are two types of stability: active and passive. Consider a ship, which, if designed well, should be able to sail through a storm without intervention. This is passive stability. A fighter jet, in contrast, requires active stability. The plane can’t fly for more than a few seconds without having to adjust its wings. This adjustment happens so fast that it’s controlled by software. There is no inherent stability here: if you cut the power, the plane crashes.[3]

People get in trouble when they confuse the two types of stability. Relationships, for example, require attention and care. If you assume that your relationship is passively stable, you’ll wake up one day to divorce papers. Your house is also not passively stable. If not cleaned on a regular basis, it will continue to get messier and messier.

Organizations require stability as well. If you’re a company that relies on debt, you’re not passively stable but actively stable. Factoring in a margin of safety, this means that the people giving you the credit should be passively stable. If you’re both actively stable, then when the power gets cut, you’re likely to be in a position of weakness, not strength.

With active stability, you’re applying energy to a system in order to bring about some advantage (keeping the plane from crashing, your relationship going, the house clean, etc.), If we move a little further down the rabbit hole, we can see how applying the same amount of energy can yield totally different results.

Let’s use the analogy of coughing.[4] Coughing is the transfer of energy as heat. If you cough in a quiet coffee shop, which you can think of as a system with low entropy, you cause a big change. Your cough is disruptive. On the other hand, if you cough in Times Square, a system with a lot of entropy, that same cough will have no impact. While you change the entropy in both cases, the impact you have with the same cough is proportional to the existing entropy.

Now think of this example in relation to your organization. You’re applying energy to get something done. The higher the entropy in the system, the less efficient the energy you apply will be. The same person applying 20 units of energy in a big bureaucracy is going to see less impact than someone applying the same 20 units in a small startup.

You can think about this idea in a competitive sense, too. If you’re starting a business and you’re competing against very effective and efficient people, a lot of effort will get absorbed. It’s not going to be very efficient. If, on the other hand, you compete against less efficient and effective people, the same amount of energy will be more efficient in its conversion.

In essence, for a change to occur, you must apply more energy to the system than is extracted by the system.

Notes:

Folksonomies: mind hacks proper living active stability

Taxonomies:

Keywords:
Active Stability (0.634042 (:0.000000)), quiet coffee shop (0.617442 (:0.000000)), low entropy (0.601178 (:0.000000)), big change (0.589111 (:0.000000)), plane crashes (0.587831 (:0.000000)), Everyday Lives (0.584518 (:0.000000)), lot of entropy (0.575596 (:0.000000)), rabbit hole (0.564916 (:0.000000)), Times Square (0.561785 (:0.000000)), less impact (0.560857 (:0.000000)), fighter jet (0.559281 (:0.000000)), efficient people (0.554804 (:0.000000)), amount of energy (0.554781 (:0.000000)), regular basis (0.548406 (:0.000000)), Entropy (0.548375 (:0.000000)), effective people (0.534713 (:0.000000)), margin of safety (0.531414 (:0.000000)), energy (0.530959 (:0.000000)), big bureaucracy (0.530222 (:0.000000)), cough (0.529974 (:0.000000)), types of stability (0.526610 (:0.000000)), Coughing (0.526512 (:0.000000)), plane (0.525951 (:0.000000)), units of energy (0.525282 (:0.000000)), transfer of energy (0.523068 (:0.000000)), inherent stability (0.522597 (:0.000000)), different results (0.521995 (:0.000000)), People (0.520257 (:0.000000)), Relationships (0.519014 (:0.000000)), hand (0.518876 (:0.000000)), impact (0.515940 (:0.000000)), stability (0.514425 (:0.000000)), order (0.513278 (:0.000000)), advantage (0.512572 (:0.000000)), essence (0.512550 (:0.000000)), adjustment (0.511487 (:0.000000)), company (0.511463 (:0.000000)), power (0.511146 (:0.000000)), cases (0.510566 (:0.000000)), things (0.510505 (:0.000000)), change (0.509913 (:0.000000)), business (0.509639 (:0.000000)), lot of effort (0.509580 (:0.000000)), relationship (0.509510 (:0.000000)), example (0.508674 (:0.000000)), person (0.508142 (:0.000000)), analogy (0.506724 (:0.000000)), house (0.506586 (:0.000000)), contrast (0.506507 (:0.000000)), trouble (0.506480 (:0.000000))

Entities:
cough:HealthCondition (0.771940 (:0.000000)), Times Square:Facility (0.384214 (:0.000000)), one day:Quantity (0.384214 (:0.000000))

Concepts:
Energy (0.966291): dbpedia_resource
Heat (0.685260): dbpedia_resource
Entropy (0.609133): dbpedia_resource
Thermodynamics (0.606348): dbpedia_resource
Temperature (0.546737): dbpedia_resource
Joule (0.539989): dbpedia_resource
Statistical mechanics (0.536506): dbpedia_resource
Plane (0.532881): dbpedia_resource

Battling Entropy: Making Order of the Chaos in Our Lives
Electronic/World Wide Web>Blog:  Street, Farnam (2018), Battling Entropy: Making Order of the Chaos in Our Lives, Retrieved on 2019-03-02
• Source Material [fs.blog]
• Folksonomies: entropy mind hacks