Literacy Increases Compassion

The human capacity for compassion is not a reflex that is triggered automatically by the presence of another living thing. As we shall see in chapter 9, though people in all cultures can react sympathetically to kin, friends, and babies, they tend to hold back when it comes to larger circles of neighbors, strangers, foreigners, and other sentient beings. In his book The Expanding Circle, the philosopher Peter Singer has argued that over the course of history, people have enlarged the range of beings whose interests they value as they value their own.136 An interesting question is what inflated the empathy circle. And a good candidate is the expansion of literacy.

Reading is a technology for perspective-taking. When someone else’s thoughts are in your head, you are observing the world from that person’s vantage point. Not only are you taking in sights and sounds that you could not experience firsthand, but you have stepped inside that person’s mind and are temporarily sharing his or her attitudes and reactions. As we shall see, “empathy” in the sense of adopting someone’s viewpoint is not the same as “empathy” in the sense of feeling compassion toward the person, but the first can lead to the second by a natural route. Stepping into someone else’s vantage point reminds you that the other fellow has a first-person, present-tense, ongoing stream of consciousness that is very much like your own but not the same as your own. It’s not a big leap to suppose that the habit of reading other people’s words could put one in the habit of entering other people’s minds, including their pleasures and pains. Slipping even for a moment into the perspective of someone who is turning black in a pillory or desperately pushing burning faggots away from her body or convulsing under the two hundredth stroke of the lash may give a person second thoughts as to whether these cruelties should ever be visited upon anyone.

Adopting other people’s vantage points can alter one’s convictions in other ways. Exposure to worlds that can be seen only through the eyes of a foreigner, an explorer, or a historian can turn an unquestioned norm (“That’s the way it’s done”) into an explicit observation (“That’s what our tribe happens to do now”). This self-consciousness is the first step toward asking whether the practice could be done in some other way. Also, learning that over the course of history the first can become last and the last can become first may instill the habit of mind that reminds us, “There but for fortune go I.”


Hunt suggests a causal chain: reading epistolary novels about characters unlike oneself exercises the ability to put oneself in other people’s shoes, which turns one against cruel punishments and other abuses of human rights. As usual, it is hard to rule out alternative explanations for the correlation. Perhaps people became more empathic for other reasons, which simultaneously made them receptive to epistolary novels and concerned with others’ mistreatment.

But the full-strength causal hypothesis may be more than a fantasy of English teachers. The ordering of events is in the right direction: technological advances in publishing, the mass production of books, the expansion of literacy, and the popularity of the novel all preceded the major humanitarian reforms of the 18th century. And in some cases a bestselling novel or memoir demonstrably exposed a wide range of readers to the suffering of a forgotten class of victims and led to a change in policy. Around the same time that Uncle Tom’s Cabin mobilized abolitionist sentiment in the United States, Charles Dickens’s Oliver Twist (1838) and Nicholas Nickleby (1839) opened people’s eyes to the mistreatment of children in British workhouses and orphanages, and Richard Henry Dana’s Two Years Before the Mast: A Personal Narrative of Life at Sea (1840) and Herman Melville’s White Jacket helped end the flogging of sailors. In the past century Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front, George Orwell’s 1984, Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich , Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Elie Wiesel’s Night, Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five, Alex Haley’s Roots, Anchee Min’s Red Azalea, Azar Nafisi’s Reading Lolita in Tehran, and Alice Walker’s Possessing the Secret of Joy (a novel that features female genital mutilation) all raised public awareness of the suffering of people who might otherwise have been ignored.141 Cinema and television reached even larger audiences and offered experiences that were even more immediate. In chapter 9 we will learn of experiments that confirm that fictional narratives can evoke people’s empathy and prick them to action.


Folksonomies: literacy morality

/technology and computing (0.446882)
/technology and computing/consumer electronics/camera and photo equipment/telescopes (0.446219)
/art and entertainment/books and literature (0.368639)

vantage point (0.935920 (positive:0.493545)), philosopher Peter Singer (0.916022 (neutral:0.000000)), desperately pushing burning (0.900274 (negative:-0.788363)), full-strength causal hypothesis (0.894426 (negative:-0.262456)), female genital mutilation (0.889920 (neutral:0.000000)), Erich Maria Remarque (0.888318 (neutral:0.000000)), Richard Henry Dana (0.885504 (neutral:0.000000)), empathy circle (0.883110 (positive:0.643834)), major humanitarian reforms (0.879975 (neutral:0.000000)), people (0.874849 (negative:-0.013019)), people’s vantage (0.863274 (positive:0.313800)), people’s words (0.844203 (negative:-0.622179)), people’s minds (0.840841 (negative:-0.622179)), Literacy Increases (0.836411 (neutral:0.000000)), people’s eyes (0.833656 (negative:-0.296989)), people’s shoes (0.831225 (neutral:0.000000)), sentient beings (0.828665 (neutral:0.000000)), epistolary novels (0.827915 (neutral:0.000000)), feeling compassion (0.826692 (neutral:0.000000)), person’s mind (0.822446 (negative:-0.392533)), human capacity (0.818684 (neutral:0.000000)), Expanding Circle (0.818410 (neutral:0.000000)), person second thoughts (0.817855 (negative:-0.788363)), larger circles (0.817322 (negative:-0.298912)), unquestioned norm (0.815684 (neutral:0.000000)), British workhouses (0.812470 (negative:-0.296989)), good candidate (0.811931 (positive:0.736856)), Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (0.810127 (neutral:0.000000)), abolitionist sentiment (0.808871 (neutral:0.000000)), Elie Wiesel (0.808682 (neutral:0.000000))

Hunt:Person (0.868659 (negative:-0.207669)), Peter Singer:Person (0.829125 (neutral:0.000000)), Erich Maria Remarque:Person (0.789081 (positive:0.343497)), Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:Person (0.740636 (neutral:0.000000)), Azar Nafisi:Person (0.724566 (neutral:0.000000)), Western Front:Organization (0.719478 (positive:0.343497)), Herman Melville:Person (0.717334 (neutral:0.000000)), Richard Henry Dana:Person (0.715481 (neutral:0.000000)), Tehran:City (0.711971 (neutral:0.000000)), Elie Wiesel:Person (0.708231 (neutral:0.000000)), Alice Walker:Person (0.693385 (positive:0.400796)), United States:Country (0.690687 (neutral:0.000000)), Charles Dickens:Person (0.677699 (neutral:0.000000)), Uncle Tom:Person (0.676915 (neutral:0.000000)), Nicholas Nickleby:Person (0.673083 (negative:-0.308443)), George Orwell:Person (0.672702 (neutral:0.000000)), Arthur Koestler:Person (0.668877 (negative:-0.242434)), ignored.141 Cinema:Facility (0.667925 (negative:-0.554145)), Alex Haley:Person (0.651500 (neutral:0.000000)), Ivan Denisovich:Person (0.651138 (neutral:0.000000)), human rights:FieldTerminology (0.650631 (negative:-0.579537)), Harper Lee:Person (0.641474 (negative:-0.391674)), Kurt Vonnegut:Person (0.632829 (neutral:0.000000)), Oliver Twist:Person (0.603417 (neutral:0.000000)), Two Years:Quantity (0.603417 (neutral:0.000000)), One Day:Quantity (0.603417 (neutral:0.000000))

Novel (0.951426): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Reading Lolita in Tehran (0.740200): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (0.737633): website | dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Suffering (0.720824): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Azar Nafisi (0.590435): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Erich Maria Remarque (0.565922): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Empathy (0.550760): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Herman Melville (0.545956): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago

 The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Pinker, Steven (2011-10-04), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, Penguin, Retrieved on 2015-05-29
  • Source Material []
  • Folksonomies: enlightenment culture ethics violence