22 JAN 2014 by ideonexus

 Descartes Rules

I thought the following four [rules] would be enough, provided that I made a firm and constant resolution not to fail even once in the observance of them. The first was never to accept anything as true if I had not evident knowledge of its being so; that is, carefully to avoid precipitancy and prejudice, and to embrace in my judgment only what presented itself to my mind SO cleariy and distinctly that I had no occasion to doubt it. The second, to divide each problem I examined into as many ...
  1  notes

The basis for empiricism, even if he abandons them in his own arguments.

23 MAR 2013 by ideonexus

 The Watson/Holmes Modes of Thought

As Holmes reminds us, “Like all other arts, the Science of Deduction and Analysis is one which can only be acquired by long and patient study nor is life long enough to allow any mortal to attain the highest possible perfection in it.” But it’s also more than mere fancy. In essence, it comes down to one simple formula: to move from a System Watson– to a System Holmes–governed thinking takes mindfulness plus motivation. (That, and a lot of practice.) Mindfulness, in the sense of cons...
Folksonomies: mindfulness
Folksonomies: mindfulness
  1  notes

Watson is on autopilot, Holmes is mindfulness.

28 APR 2012 by ideonexus

 In the Beginning According to Einstein

In the beginning (if there was such a thing), God created Newton’s laws of motion together with the necessary masses and forces. This is all; everything beyond this follows from the development of appropriate mathematical methods by means of deduction.
Folksonomies: science law
Folksonomies: science law
  1  notes

There was Newton's laws, from which all else naturally followed.

25 APR 2012 by ideonexus

 Seeing VS Observing

I could not help laughing at the ease with which he explained his process of deduction. 'When I hear you give your reasons,' I remarked, 'the thing always appears to me to be so ridiculously simple that I could easily do it myself, though at each successive instance of your reasoning I am baffled, until you explain your process. And yet I believe that my eyes are as good as yours.' 'Quite so,' he answered, lighting a cigarette, and throwing himself down into an arm-chair. 'You see, but you d...
Folksonomies: observation mindfulness
Folksonomies: observation mindfulness
 1  1  notes

Sherlock Holmes explains the difference between taking your world for granted and observing it scientifically.

18 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Chemistry is a Science of Pure Experimentation

For chemistry is no science form'd à priori; 'tis no production of the human mind, framed by reasoning and deduction: it took its rise from a number of experiments casually made, without any expectation of what follow'd; and was only reduced into an art or system, by collecting and comparing the effects of such unpremeditated experiments, and observing the uniform tendency thereof. So far, then, as a number of experimenters agree to establish any undoubted truth; so far they may be consider'...
Folksonomies: chemistry experimentation
Folksonomies: chemistry experimentation
  1  notes

It's knowledge was built up without reasoning, but purely through testing.