Mistrust arguments from authority

One of the great commandments of science is, 'Mistrust arguments from authority'. (Scientists, being primates, and thus given to dominance hierarchies, of course do not always follow this commandment.) Too many such arguments have proved too painfully wrong. Authorities must prove their contentions like everybody else. This independence of science, its occasional unwillingness to accept conventional wisdom, makes it dangerous to doctrines less self-critical, or with pretensions to certitude.

Because science carries us toward an understanding of how the world is, rather than how we would wish it to be, its findings may not in all cases be immediately comprehensible or satisfying. It may take a little work to restructure our mindsets. Some of science is very simple. When it gets complicated, that's usually because the world is complicated - or because we're complicated. When we shy away from it because it seems too difficult (or because we've been taught so poorly), we surrender the ability to take charge of our future. We are disenfranchised. Our selfconfidence erodes.

But when we pass beyond the barrier, when the findings and methods of science get through to us, when we understand and put this knowledge to use, many feel deep satisfaction. This is true for everyone, but especially for children - born with a zest for knowledge, aware that they must live in a future moulded by science, but so often convinced in their adolescence that science is not for them. I know personally, both from having science explained to me and from my attempts to explain it to others, how gratifying it is when we get it, when obscure terms suddenly take on meaning, when we grasp what all the fuss is about, when deep wonders are revealed.

In its encounter with Nature, science invariably elicits a sense of reverence and awe. The very act of understanding is a celebration of joining, merging, even if on a very modest scale, with the magnificence of the Cosmos. And the cumulative worldwide build-up of knowledge over time converts science into something only a little short of a trans-national, trans-generational meta-mind.

Notes:

One of the "great commandments of science."

Folksonomies: science empiricism authority

Taxonomies:
/science (0.735040)
/law, govt and politics (0.277948)
/law, govt and politics/legal issues/civil rights (0.261669)

Keywords:
science (0.904347 (positive:0.118371)), great commandments (0.857682 (positive:0.519830)), cumulative worldwide build-up (0.748619 (negative:-0.449551)), time converts science (0.704003 (negative:-0.449551)), Mistrust arguments (0.639980 (neutral:0.000000)), occasional unwillingness (0.516368 (negative:-0.663236)), conventional wisdom (0.473869 (negative:-0.663236)), little work (0.461323 (negative:-0.695162)), modest scale (0.450082 (positive:0.557016)), obscure terms (0.440412 (negative:-0.450926)), trans-generational meta-mind (0.436222 (neutral:0.000000)), deep satisfaction (0.432839 (positive:0.543308)), deep wonders (0.422161 (negative:-0.504482)), authority (0.273167 (neutral:0.000000)), knowledge (0.273096 (negative:-0.091961)), findings (0.259938 (negative:-0.424027)), understanding (0.240052 (positive:0.635683)), mindsets (0.211674 (negative:-0.695162)), pretensions (0.210840 (negative:-0.578220)), contentions (0.208273 (negative:-0.312499)), certitude (0.201572 (negative:-0.578220))

Concepts:
Understanding (0.964267): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Explanation (0.543199): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Critical thinking (0.506826): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Scientific method (0.504648): dbpedia | freebase
Dominance hierarchy (0.465892): dbpedia | freebase
Epistemology (0.463333): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Knowledge (0.462971): dbpedia | freebase
Theory (0.440929): dbpedia | freebase

 The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Sagan , Carl and Druyan , Ann (1997-02-25), The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Ballantine Books, Retrieved on 2011-05-04
Folksonomies: science empiricism rationalism