Inversion of Information and Attention
What’s happened is, really rapidly, we’ve undergone this tectonic shift, this inversion between information and attention. Most of the systems that we have in society—whether it’s news, advertising, even our legal systems—still assume an environment of information scarcity. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, but it doesn’t necessarily protect freedom of attention. There wasn’t really anything obstructing people’s attention at the time it was written. Back in an information-scarce environment, the role of a newspaper was to bring you information—your problem was lacking it. Now it’s the opposite. We have too much.
Notes:
Folksonomies: information attention scarcity
Taxonomies:
/society/sex (0.575756)
/religion and spirituality (0.575132)
/health and fitness/therapy (0.366149)
Keywords:
attention (0.974140 (:0.000000)), tectonic shift (0.931055 (:0.000000)), people’s attention (0.913534 (:0.000000)), information scarcity (0.831200 (:0.000000)), legal systems—still (0.803347 (:0.000000)), information—your problem (0.765014 (:0.000000)), information-scarce environment (0.740191 (:0.000000)), inversion (0.688339 (:0.000000)), freedom (0.538697 (:0.000000)), opposite (0.517132 (:0.000000)), Amendment (0.515757 (:0.000000)), news (0.480932 (:0.000000)), speech (0.478211 (:0.000000)), time (0.475390 (:0.000000)), role (0.473407 (:0.000000)), newspaper (0.473192 (:0.000000))
Concepts:
First Amendment to the United States Constitution (0.949620): dbpedia_resource
Freedom of speech (0.796838): dbpedia_resource
It Was Written (0.718208): dbpedia_resource
Obscenity (0.600081): dbpedia_resource
Freedom of speech in the United States (0.583517): dbpedia_resource
Freedom of association (0.573545): dbpedia_resource
Freedom of thought (0.539324): dbpedia_resource
Protection (0.483748): dbpedia_resource
