Celebrity Economy

This century's last great trend was noted by acute observers in 1996, yet most people failed to appreciate it. While business gurus were proclaiming the new dominance of creativity and innovation over mere production, the growing ease with which information was transmitted and reproduced made it harder for creators to profit from their creations. Nowadays, if you develop a marvelous piece of software, everyone will have downloaded a free copy from the Net the next day. If you record a magnificent concert, bootleg CD's will be sold in Shanghai next week. If you produce a wonderful film, high-quality videos will be available in Mexico City next month.

How, then, could creativity be made to pay? The answer was already becoming apparent a century ago: creations must make money indirectly by promoting sales of something else. Just as auto makers used to sponsor grand prix racers to spice up the image of their cars, computer manufacturers now sponsor hotshot software designers to build brand recognition for their hardware. The same is true for individuals. The royalties that the Four Sopranos earn from their recordings are surprisingly small; the recordings mainly serve as advertisements for their concerts. The fans attend these concerts not to appreciate the music (they can do that far better at home), but for the experience of seeing their idols in person. In short, instead of becoming a knowledge economy we became a celebrity economy.

Luckily, the same technology that has made it possible to capitalize directly on knowledge has also created many more opportunities for celebrity. The 500-channel world is a place of many subcultures, each with its own heroes. Still, the celebrity economy has been hard on people -- especially for those with a scholarly bent. A century ago, it was actually possible to make a living as a more or less pure scholar. Now if you want to devote yourself to scholarship, there are only three choices. Like Charles Darwin, you can be born rich. Like Alfred Wallace, the less-fortunate co-discoverer of evolution, you can make your living doing something else and pursue research as a hobby. Or, like many 19th-century scientists, you can try to cash in on a scholarly reputation by going on the lecture circuit.

Notes:

Endless channels of media allow for more celebrities, but to smaller audiences. In order to make money from media, celebrities must sell more than their works. Their works must serve as advertisements for something else, like paid performances or lectures.

Folksonomies: art information economy

Taxonomies:
/finance/grants, scholarships and financial aid/scholarships (0.495843)
/technology and computing (0.483856)
/art and entertainment/shows and events/concert (0.480252)

Keywords:
celebrity economy (0.946680 (negative:-0.401557)), Celebrity Economy Endless (0.800311 (neutral:0.000000)), hotshot software designers (0.700149 (positive:0.596251)), grand prix racers (0.690563 (neutral:0.000000)), smaller audiences (0.541633 (neutral:0.000000)), knowledge economy (0.536921 (neutral:0.000000)), mere production (0.536040 (neutral:0.000000)), new dominance (0.535156 (neutral:0.000000)), marvelous piece (0.533720 (positive:0.590572)), business gurus (0.533195 (neutral:0.000000)), acute observers (0.530450 (neutral:0.000000)), great trend (0.527817 (neutral:0.000000)), magnificent concert (0.524215 (positive:0.592107)), bootleg CD (0.523515 (neutral:0.000000)), Mexico City (0.518272 (positive:0.369591)), wonderful film (0.517817 (positive:0.720057)), high-quality videos (0.517257 (positive:0.369591)), free copy (0.516068 (positive:0.532026)), auto makers (0.513288 (neutral:0.000000)), brand recognition (0.511957 (positive:0.596251)), Charles Darwin (0.508963 (neutral:0.000000)), 19th-century scientists (0.503988 (neutral:0.000000)), less-fortunate co-discoverer (0.502027 (neutral:0.000000)), 500-channel world (0.500750 (positive:0.377032)), scholarly reputation (0.499403 (neutral:0.000000)), scholarly bent (0.498953 (negative:-0.291430)), Alfred Wallace (0.498701 (neutral:0.000000)), lecture circuit (0.492816 (neutral:0.000000)), pure scholar (0.488554 (neutral:0.000000)), advertisements (0.386189 (positive:0.201264))

Entities:
Alfred Wallace:Person (0.746141 (neutral:0.000000)), Charles Darwin:Person (0.730459 (neutral:0.000000)), Shanghai:City (0.706332 (neutral:0.000000)), Mexico City:City (0.693841 (positive:0.369591))

Concepts:
Charles Darwin (0.936442): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Advertising (0.864474): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Celebrity (0.709916): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Alfred Russel Wallace (0.676691): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Pet Shop Boys (0.670494): website | dbpedia | freebase | yago | musicBrainz
Money (0.649222): dbpedia | freebase
Charles Lyell (0.647878): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Grand Prix motor racing (0.624812): dbpedia | freebase

 White Collars Turn Blue
Periodicals>Newsletter Article:  Krugman, Paul (September 29, 1996), White Collars Turn Blue, New York Times, Retrieved on 2013-06-14
  • Source Material [www.nytimes.com]
  • Folksonomies: futurism


    Triples

    17 NOV 2013

     Celebrity and the Rise of a Reputation Economy

    Celebrity Economy > Time Sequence > Beginnings of the Reputation Economy
    With multiplying numbers of sub-cultures, there are more and more opportunities for celebrity, but for smaller and smaller groups of people.
    Folksonomies: celebrity reputation
    Folksonomies: celebrity reputation
    17 NOV 2013

     Celebrity Economy/Definition of Celebrity

    Celebrity Economy > Example/Illustration > Twitter, Celebrity, Asymmetric and Symmetric Social Connections
    In a social networked medium, understanding celebrity is important if you are going to make money from it.
    Folksonomies: celebrity income profession
    Folksonomies: celebrity income profession


    Schemas

    17 NOV 2013

     Celebrity as a Profession in the Digital Age

    WWW has made celebrities more numerous, their followings smaller, and the ability to make a living off of it more interesting.
     5