Humans Are Naturally Xenophobic

the more important thing about an aggregatory idea from the State maker's point of view is not so much what it explicitly involves as what it implicitly repudiates. The natural man does not feel he is aggregating at all, unless he aggregates against something. He refers himself to the tribe; he is loyal to the tribe, and quite inseparably he fears or dislikes those others outside the tribe. The tribe is always at least defensively hostile and usually actively hostile to humanity beyond the aggregation. The Anti-idea, it would seem, is inseparable from the aggregatory idea; it is a necessity of the human mind. When we think of the class A as desirable, we think of Not-A as undesirable. The two things are as inevitably connected as the tendons of our hands, so that when we flatten down our little fingers on our palms, the fourth digit, whether we want it or not, comes down halfway.

When we inquire, as well as the unformed condition of terrestrial sociology permits, into the aggregatory ideas that seem to satisfy men, we find a remarkable complex, a disorderly complex, in the minds of nearly all our civilised contemporaries. For example, all sorts of aggregatory ideas come and go across the chameleon surfaces of my botanist's mind. He has a strong feeling for systematic botanists as against plant physiologists, whom he regards as lewd and evil scoundrels in this relation, but he has a strong feeling for all botanists, and, indeed, all biologists, as against physicists, and those who profess the exact sciences, all of whom he regards as dull, mechanical, ugly-minded scoundrels in this relation; but he has a strong feeling for all who profess what is called Science as against psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and literary men, whom he regards as wild, foolish, immoral scoundrels in this relation; but he has a strong feeling for all educated men as against the working man, whom he regards as a cheating, lying, loafing, drunken, thievish, dirty scoundrel in this relation; but so soon as the working man is comprehended together with those others, as Englishmen%u2014which includes, in this case, I may remark, the Scottish and Welsh%u2014he holds them superior to all other sorts of European, whom he regards, &c....

This habit of intensifying all class definitions, and particularly those in which one has a personal interest, is in the very constitution of man's mind. It is part of the defect of that instrument. We may watch against it and prevent it doing any great injustices, or leading us into follies, but to eradicate it is an altogether different matter. There it is, to be reckoned with, like the coccyx, the pineal eye, and the vermiform appendix.

Notes:

This is a fact of human nature that must either be overcome or used to good purpose. It even occurs in academia, as with the example of the botanist.

Keywords:
strong feeling (0.957075 (neutral:0.000000)), aggregatory idea (0.792719 (negative:-0.329595)), aggregatory ideas (0.743025 (negative:-0.208072)), terrestrial sociology permits (0.731701 (neutral:0.000000)), altogether different matter (0.703349 (positive:0.230415)), working man (0.671783 (neutral:0.000000)), immoral scoundrels (0.610981 (neutral:0.000000)), ugly-minded scoundrels (0.595554 (neutral:0.000000)), evil scoundrels (0.593644 (neutral:0.000000)), natural man (0.580288 (neutral:0.000000)), State maker (0.575262 (negative:-0.329595)), important thing (0.572742 (negative:-0.329595)), civilised contemporaries (0.567171 (negative:-0.578872)), systematic botanists (0.561368 (neutral:0.000000)), disorderly complex (0.550837 (negative:-0.493581)), dirty scoundrel (0.550642 (neutral:0.000000)), little fingers (0.548663 (negative:-0.623078)), plant physiologists (0.545203 (neutral:0.000000)), pineal eye (0.542626 (neutral:0.000000)), unformed condition (0.540854 (neutral:0.000000)), Englishmen%u2014which includes, in this case, I may remark, the Scottish and Welsh%u2014he holds them superior to all other sorts of European, whom he regards, &c.... (0.540678 (neutral:0.000000)), remarkable complex (0.535013 (positive:0.212163)), great injustices (0.533796 (negative:-0.207793)), human mind (0.533756 (positive:0.494398)), exact sciences (0.533065 (neutral:0.000000)), vermiform appendix. (0.526059 (neutral:0.000000)), good purpose (0.524959 (neutral:0.000000)), literary men (0.523013 (neutral:0.000000)), Welsh%u2014he holds them superior to all other sorts of European, whom he regards, &c.... (0.520156 (neutral:0.000000)), human nature (0.518432 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Psychology (0.958092): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Thought (0.908072): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Mind (0.857136): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Idea (0.777334): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Philosophy (0.656112): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
MIND (0.640758): geo

 A Modern Utopia
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Wells, H.G. (2004), A Modern Utopia, Project Gutenberg, New York, NY, Retrieved on 2010-11-01
  • Source Material [www.gutenberg.org]
  • Folksonomies: centrism utopias