Post-Symbolic Communication

Post-symbolic communication will be like a shared, waking state, intentional dream. Instead of the word "house", you will express a particular house and be able to walk into it, and instead of the category "house" you will peer into an apparently small bucket that is big enough inside to hold all the universe's houses so you can assess what they have in common directly. It will be a fluid form of experiential concreteness providing similar but divergent expressive power to that of abstraction.

[...]

It's not only the narcissism of the young (and not so young) human mind or the primality of the control of one's own body that makes self-transformation compelling. Evolution, as generous as she ended up being with us humans, was stingy with potential means of expression. Compare us with the mimic octopus which can morph into all sorts of creatures and objects, and can animate its skin. An advanced civilization of cephalopods might develop words as we know them, but probably only as an adjunct to a natural form of post-symbolic communication.

We humans can control precious little of the world with enough agility to keep up with our thoughts and feelings. The fingers and the tongue are the about it. Symbols as we know them in language are a trick, or what programmers call a "hack," that expands the power of little appendage wiggles to refer to all that we can't instantly become or create.

Notes:

A fascinating idea from Jaron Lanier.

Folksonomies: communication edge symbolism

Taxonomies:
/health and fitness/disorders/sleep disorders (0.571089)
/technology and computing/hardware/computer (0.491665)
/style and fashion/accessories/gloves (0.468081)

Keywords:
post-symbolic communication (0.918196 (positive:0.548185)), apparently small bucket (0.743288 (positive:0.307554)), divergent expressive power (0.735091 (positive:0.542797)), little appendage wiggles (0.727825 (negative:-0.487765)), ) human mind or the primality of the control of one's own body that makes self-transformation compelling. (0.702316 (negative:-0.360705)), Jaron Lanier (0.628702 (positive:0.802524)), experiential concreteness (0.606385 (positive:0.714761)), fascinating idea (0.604805 (positive:0.802524)), intentional dream (0.603014 (neutral:0.000000)), self-transformation compelling (0.596838 (positive:0.265249)), mimic octopus (0.585778 (negative:-0.321832)), particular house (0.571779 (neutral:0.000000)), fluid form (0.567107 (positive:0.714761)), potential means (0.564944 (neutral:0.000000)), advanced civilization (0.562974 (positive:0.568899)), natural form (0.553171 (positive:0.409786)), humans (0.470838 (positive:0.548219)), narcissism (0.443301 (negative:-0.409796)), cephalopods (0.442486 (positive:0.568899)), primality (0.442425 (positive:0.265249)), adjunct (0.440664 (positive:0.409786)), fingers (0.439077 (neutral:0.000000)), abstraction (0.438776 (positive:0.542797)), tongue (0.437056 (neutral:0.000000)), hack (0.434511 (negative:-0.478145)), sorts (0.434494 (negative:-0.321832)), state (0.433216 (positive:0.271444)), feelings (0.432822 (positive:0.735812)), word (0.431194 (negative:-0.388489)), trick (0.431067 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
Jaron Lanier:Person (0.819239 (positive:0.802524))

Concepts:
Thought (0.974259): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Mind (0.693899): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Idea (0.634069): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Jaron Lanier (0.620437): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Abstraction (0.600081): dbpedia | freebase
Octopus (0.569996): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Programming language (0.564531): dbpedia | freebase
Word (0.552221): dbpedia | freebase

 What we believe but cannot prove
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Brockman , John (2006), What we believe but cannot prove, Pocket Books, Retrieved on 2012-01-03
  • Source Material [books.google.com]
  • Folksonomies: science