Cancer cells that produce their own anti-cancer medication

Protein ‘switches’ could turn cancer cells into tiny chemotherapy factories

September 30, 2011 by Editor

Johns Hopkins researchers say they have devised a protein “switch” that instructs cancer cells to produce their own anti-cancer medication.

The researchers, led by Marc Ostermeier, a Johns Hopkins chemical and biomolecular engineering professor in the Whiting School of Engineering, showed that these switches, working from inside the cells, can activate a powerful cell-killing drug when the device detects a marker linked to cancer. The goal, the scientists said, is to deploy a new type of weapon that causes cancer cells to self-destruct while sparing healthy tissue.

Creating cancer-fighting drugs in cells

One key problem in fighting cancer is that broadly applied chemotherapy usually also harms healthy cells. In the protein-switch strategy, however, a doctor would instead administer a “prodrug,” meaning an inactive form of a cancer-fighting drug. Only when a cancer marker is present in a particular cell would the cellular switch turn this harmless prodrug into a potent form of chemotherapy.

“The switch in effect turns the cancer cell into a factory for producing the anti-cancer drug inside the cancer cell,” said  Ostermeier. “The healthy cells will also receive the prodrug, but ideally it will remain in its non-toxic form. Our hope is that this strategy will kill more cancer cells while decreasing the unfortunate side effects on healthy cells.”

To demonstrate that these switches can work, the research team successfully tested them on human colon cancer and breast cancer cells in Ostermeier’s lab and in the laboratory of James R. Eshleman, a professor of pathology and oncology in the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

“This is a radically different tool to attack cancers,” said Eshleman, “but many experiments need to be done before we will be able to use it in patients.”

The next step is animal testing, expected to begin within a year, Ostermeier said.

Trojan-horse strategy

Ostermeier’s team made the cancer-fighting switch by fusing together two different proteins. One protein detects a marker that cancer cells produce. The other protein, from yeast, can turn an inactive prodrug into a cancer-cell killer. “When the first part of the switch detects cancer, it tells its partner to activate the chemotherapy drug, destroying the cell,” Ostermeier said.

For this switch to work, it must first get inside the cancer cells. Ostermeier said this can be done through a technique in which the switch gene is delivered inside the cell. The switch gene serves as the blueprint from which the cell’s own machinery constructs the protein switch.

Another approach, he said, would be to develop methods to deliver the switch protein itself to cells. Once the switches are in place, the patient would receive the inactive chemotherapy drug, which would turn into a cancer attacker inside the cells where the switch has been flipped on.

Although many researchers are developing methods to deliver anti-cancer drugs specifically to cancer cells, Ostermeier said the protein-switch tactic skirts difficulties encountered in those methods.

“The protein switch concept changes the game by providing a mechanism to target production of the anti-cancer drugs inside cancer cells instead of targeting delivery of the anti-cancer drug to cancer cells,” he said.

Ref.: Chapman M. Wright et al., A protein therapeutic modality founded on molecular regulationPNAS 2011; September 19, 2011

Notes:

Scientist work towards devising a protein "switch" that will instruct cancer cells to produce their own anti-cancer medication without hurting healthy cells, unlike chemotherapy.

Folksonomies: cancer medicine

Keywords:
cancer cells (0.904278 (negative:-0.573762)), healthy cells (0.685354 (positive:0.058047)), anti-cancer medication (0.523533 (negative:-0.537080)), breast cancer cells (0.510682 (negative:-0.430229)), Johns Hopkins (0.472109 (negative:-0.329295)), anti-cancer medication Scientist (0.457251 (negative:-0.533097)), anti-cancer drug (0.416990 (negative:-0.664593)), tiny chemotherapy factories (0.413499 (negative:-0.484091)), switch (0.410101 (negative:-0.097210)), switch gene (0.403441 (neutral:0.000000)), protein switch (0.397410 (neutral:0.000000)), switch protein (0.396069 (neutral:0.000000)), anti-cancer drugs (0.392141 (negative:-0.598939)), inactive chemotherapy drug (0.385983 (negative:-0.354234)), human colon cancer (0.378642 (negative:-0.430229)), cellular switch (0.376505 (negative:-0.383411)), cancer-fighting switch (0.367582 (positive:0.468536)), Johns Hopkins chemical (0.367296 (neutral:0.000000)), Johns Hopkins researchers (0.367285 (negative:-0.244542)), powerful cell-killing drug (0.363478 (negative:-0.482909)), James R. Eshleman (0.362614 (negative:-0.430229)), biomolecular engineering professor (0.360406 (neutral:0.000000)), Johns Hopkins School (0.353369 (negative:-0.414049)), radically different tool (0.351609 (negative:-0.334510)), tactic skirts difficulties (0.347531 (negative:-0.532146)), Protein ‘switches (0.340301 (neutral:0.000000)), Ostermeier (0.340007 (negative:-0.012652)), Chapman M. Wright (0.339614 (neutral:0.000000)), inactive prodrug (0.330330 (negative:-0.543532)), harmless prodrug (0.329590 (negative:-0.383411))

Entities:
cancer:HealthCondition (0.889637 (negative:-0.482005)), Marc Ostermeier:Person (0.503267 (negative:-0.532146)), Johns Hopkins:Person (0.288058 (negative:-0.244542)), James R. Eshleman:Person (0.273842 (negative:-0.430229)), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine:Organization (0.255388 (negative:-0.414049))

Concepts:
Cancer (0.951173): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Chemotherapy (0.938905): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Oncology (0.776110): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Breast cancer (0.705748): dbpedia | freebase
Metastasis (0.587312): dbpedia | freebase
DNA (0.567091): website | dbpedia | freebase | yago
Leukemia (0.555602): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Lymphoma (0.480715): dbpedia | freebase

 
Electronic/World Wide Web>Internet Article:  Chapman M. Wrighta, R. Clay Wrighta, James R. Eshlemanb, and Marc Ostermeier, (September 19th 2011), Retrieved on 2011-10-18
  • Source Material [www.pnas.org]
  •