Karl Popper's Conclusions About Good Theories

  1. It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory — if we look for confirmations.

     

     

  2. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory — an event which would have refuted the theory.

     

     

  3. Every "good" scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen. The more a theory forbids, the better it is.

     

     

  4. A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.

     

     

  5. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.

     

     

  6. Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the theory. (I now speak in such cases of "corroborating evidence.")

     

     

  7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers — for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. (I later described such a rescuing operation as a "conventionalisttwist" or a "conventionalist stratagem.")

     

One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiabilityor refutabilityor testability.

Notes:

Summarized by the criteria of falsifiability, or refutability, or testability.

Folksonomies: science theory characteristics hypothesis good science

Taxonomies:
/science (0.526408)
/science/social science/philosophy/ethics (0.330691)
/religion and spirituality (0.259827)

Keywords:
theory (0.951840 (positive:0.137614)), genuine test (0.772314 (negative:-0.241049)), genuinely testable theories (0.764767 (neutral:0.000000)), theory ad hoc (0.724707 (neutral:0.000000)), scientific status (0.686980 (neutral:0.000000)), testability (0.664644 (neutral:0.000000)), theory forbids (0.625137 (negative:-0.200739)), falsifiability (0.624210 (positive:0.327060)), Karl Popper (0.624127 (positive:0.327060)), risky predictions (0.612285 (negative:-0.511061)), Good Theories (0.612010 (positive:0.327060)), conceivable event (0.598888 (neutral:0.000000)), certain things (0.594430 (negative:-0.381284)), confirmations (0.592250 (negative:-0.012370)), unsuccessful attempt (0.591341 (negative:-0.519619)), greater risks (0.582155 (positive:0.371083)), rescuing operation (0.580454 (neutral:0.000000)), scientific theory (0.579860 (negative:-0.203976)), auxiliary assumption (0.578759 (neutral:0.000000)), conventionalist stratagem. (0.576538 (negative:-0.231436)), refutation (0.553115 (negative:-0.305331)), result (0.486290 (negative:-0.032851)), refutability (0.475648 (neutral:0.000000)), verifications (0.454385 (neutral:0.000000)), Conclusions (0.447849 (positive:0.327060)), prohibition (0.446162 (negative:-0.203976)), virtue (0.441423 (negative:-0.247157)), criteria (0.440434 (positive:0.327060)), criterion (0.440073 (neutral:0.000000)), admirers (0.439566 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
Karl Popper:Person (0.751756 (positive:0.327060)), Irrefutability:Person (0.627902 (negative:-0.247157))

Concepts:
Scientific method (0.973977): dbpedia | freebase
Falsifiability (0.900951): dbpedia | freebase
Philosophy of science (0.844260): dbpedia | freebase
Theory (0.669616): dbpedia | freebase
Karl Popper (0.560964): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Hypothesis (0.534264): dbpedia | freebase
Testability (0.488348): dbpedia | freebase
Science (0.436822): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

 RC Series Bundle: Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics)
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Popper , Karl (2002-08-09), RC Series Bundle: Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics), Routledge, Retrieved on 2011-08-28
  • Source Material [www.stephenjaygould.org]
  • Folksonomies: science philosophy empiricism