Karl Popper's Conclusions About Good Theories
- It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory — if we look for confirmations.
- Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory — an event which would have refuted the theory.
- Every "good" scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen. The more a theory forbids, the better it is.
- A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.
- Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.
- Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the theory. (I now speak in such cases of "corroborating evidence.")
- Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers — for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. (I later described such a rescuing operation as a "conventionalisttwist" or a "conventionalist stratagem.")
One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability.
Notes:
Summarized by the criteria of falsifiability, or refutability, or testability.
Folksonomies: science theory characteristics hypothesis good science
Taxonomies:
/science (0.526408)
/science/social science/philosophy/ethics (0.330691)
/religion and spirituality (0.259827)
Keywords:
theory (0.951840 (positive:0.137614)), genuine test (0.772314 (negative:-0.241049)), genuinely testable theories (0.764767 (neutral:0.000000)), theory ad hoc (0.724707 (neutral:0.000000)), scientific status (0.686980 (neutral:0.000000)), testability (0.664644 (neutral:0.000000)), theory forbids (0.625137 (negative:-0.200739)), falsifiability (0.624210 (positive:0.327060)), Karl Popper (0.624127 (positive:0.327060)), risky predictions (0.612285 (negative:-0.511061)), Good Theories (0.612010 (positive:0.327060)), conceivable event (0.598888 (neutral:0.000000)), certain things (0.594430 (negative:-0.381284)), confirmations (0.592250 (negative:-0.012370)), unsuccessful attempt (0.591341 (negative:-0.519619)), greater risks (0.582155 (positive:0.371083)), rescuing operation (0.580454 (neutral:0.000000)), scientific theory (0.579860 (negative:-0.203976)), auxiliary assumption (0.578759 (neutral:0.000000)), conventionalist stratagem. (0.576538 (negative:-0.231436)), refutation (0.553115 (negative:-0.305331)), result (0.486290 (negative:-0.032851)), refutability (0.475648 (neutral:0.000000)), verifications (0.454385 (neutral:0.000000)), Conclusions (0.447849 (positive:0.327060)), prohibition (0.446162 (negative:-0.203976)), virtue (0.441423 (negative:-0.247157)), criteria (0.440434 (positive:0.327060)), criterion (0.440073 (neutral:0.000000)), admirers (0.439566 (neutral:0.000000))
Entities:
Karl Popper:Person (0.751756 (positive:0.327060)), Irrefutability:Person (0.627902 (negative:-0.247157))
Concepts:
Scientific method (0.973977): dbpedia | freebase
Falsifiability (0.900951): dbpedia | freebase
Philosophy of science (0.844260): dbpedia | freebase
Theory (0.669616): dbpedia | freebase
Karl Popper (0.560964): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Hypothesis (0.534264): dbpedia | freebase
Testability (0.488348): dbpedia | freebase
Science (0.436822): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc