23 JUL 2026 by ideonexus
The Game of White-Must-Win
There are many other ways in which the game of Black-and-White is switched into the game of 'White must win,' and, like the battle for survival, they depend upon ignoring, or screening out of consciousness, the interdependence of the two sides. In a curious way this is, of course, part of the Game of Black-and-White itself, because forgetting or ignoring their interdependence is 'hide' in the game of hide-and-seek. Hide-and-seek is, in turn, the Game of Black-and-White!
By way of illustratio...Folksonomies: perspective
Folksonomies: perspective
31 DEC 2025 by ideonexus
Which is Really You, the Finger or the Thumb?
Observe the stages of this differentiation, the levels of abstraction:
First, the organism from its environment, and with this knowledge
of the environment. Second, the distinction of knowing knowledge
from knowledge itself. But in concrete fact all this, like the fingerthumb opposition, is a difference which does not divide. The thumb is
not floating in the air alongside the rest of the hand. At their roots
both fingers and thumb are joined. And at our roots we are joined to
the whole subjec...Folksonomies: taxonomy categorization
Folksonomies: taxonomy categorization
21 DEC 2025 by ideonexus
Racial Theory, Science, and Fantasy
Modern concepts of race were formulated as a “widely shared theory of biologically determined, physical, intellectual and moral differences between human groups.”35 Hannah Augstein identifies three key elements in nineteenth century race-thinking: that humanity can be divided into races “whose characteristics are fixed and defy the modifying influences of external circumstances;” that these racial groupings have different “intellectual and moral capacities;” and “that mental end...Folksonomies: fantasy critical theory
Folksonomies: fantasy critical theory
10 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
The Scientific Method is a Process for Knowing that is Su...
Since mere observation cannot provide the solution to a problem, no matter how accurately it is conducted the necessary next step is inference the process which leads from the present to the future, from the known to the unknown. Every inference is a sort of adventure. Another difference between the scientific method and ordinary common sense is that the former controls the adventure more carefully, and thus reduces the danger involved. The more rigorous the method the less the danger. Safegu...10 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
The Scientific Process Encompasses Numerous Viewpoints
We can get rid of outdated ways of looking at things, of fixed experience, of ingrained intellectual habits, only by constantly expanding our experience and continually comparing one idea with another in order to select the better one. Because systematic science is the result of constant comparison of innumerable materials and experiences, it cannot be produced by individual effort; it is a social product. Science has no nationality; it admits no prejudices. Scientific discoveries made in one...10 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
The Scientific Method Produces General Principles by Whic...
Just as the first means by which science reduces the danger of error is the continual comparison of ideas and concepts, the second is the formulation of general principles by means of which we can understand cause-and-effect or sequential relationships among events. The function of a general principle or scientific law is twofold; to organize discrete objects and events in systematic order so that we can deal with them more effectively and exercise greater control over them; and to provide a ...10 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
How Scientific Experimentation is Superior to Rationality...
Now that we have looked at the differences between the experimental type of thinking and the other types we have discussed, we can see that it is superior to any of the others. Experimental thinking does, to be sure, emphasize systematization and classification, but as means, not as ends in themselves. And, along with rationalism, it emphasizes general principles and laws, but again, not as ends in themselves, but as convenient guides for making our inferences.
Neither observation nor infere...05 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
Aristotle Categorized Species as Immutable, the Theory of...
Aristotle noted three characteristics of his concept of species. First, each species is a whole. It is comprehensive, representative of all the objects embraced within it, and any one of these objects may be used as an example of all others. The species tree, for example, embraces all trees whether they are used for timber or for firewood; and any given tree may exemplify the species which includes all trees.
Second, any one species comprises objects which have common or identical elements o...Folksonomies: philosophy epistemology
Folksonomies: philosophy epistemology
Aristotle's system of thought, which defined and categorized the world, gave humans the ability to discuss and debate with common references. But it was flawed in that it defined classifications as immutable and unchanging.
05 OCT 2025 by ideonexus
Aristotle Considered Experiential Knowledge of Lower Value
Aristotle gave the name experience to change which is irregular, and differentiated this from scientific knowledge, or rational knowledge. The only changes that could come within the scope of science were those which moved in the direction of, and which were governed by, final cause——the chick and the oak, again. Typical of the things which Aristotle regarded as certain, and therefore admissible to the realm of science, were the stars of the heavens which could be counted and which moved ...Folksonomies: philosophy epistemology
Folksonomies: philosophy epistemology




