21 MAR 2012 by ideonexus

 Looking to the Present to Understand the Past

In using the present in order to reveal the past, we assume that the forces in the world are essentially the same through all time; for these forces are based on the very nature of matter, and could not have changed. The ocean has always had its waves, and those waves have always acted in the same manner. Running water on the land has ever had the same power of wear and transportation and mathematical value to its force. The laws of chemistry, heat, electricity, and mechanics have been the sa...
Folksonomies: induction
Folksonomies: induction
  1  notes

Oceans have always had waves, streams have always worn down rocks, and other natural laws have always been the same throughout time.

24 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Inferring the Universe From Our Limited Perspective

It may seem rash indeed to draw conclusions valid for the whole universe from what we can see from the small corner to which we are confined. Who knows that the whole visible universe is not like a drop of water at the surface of the earth? Inhabitants of that drop of water, as small relative to it as we are relative to the Milky Way, could not possibly imagine that beside the drop of water there might be a piece of iron or a living tissue, in which the properties of matter are entirely diffe...
Folksonomies: induction
Folksonomies: induction
  1  notes

We are like the inhabitants of a drop of water, unable to imagine other elements and molecules outside of it.

13 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Experiment is the Only Means for Learning About Nature

Man does not limit himself to seeing; he thinks and insists on learning the meaning of phenomena whose existence has been revealed to him by observation. So he reasons, compares facts, puts questions to them, and by the answers which he extracts, tests one by another. This sort of control, by means of reasoning and facts, is what constitutes experiment, properly speaking; and it is the only process that we have for teaching ourselves about the nature of things outside us.
  1  notes

Induction is fine, but observation keeps things within ourselves, experimentation takes us outside of ourselves.

12 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Induction VS Philosophizing

There are certain general Laws that run through the whole Chain of natural Effects: these are learned by the Observation and Study of Nature, and are by Men applied as well to the framing artificial things for the Use and Ornament of Life, as to the explaining the various Phænomena: Which Explication consists only in shewing the Conformity any particular Phænomenon hath to the general Laws of Nature, or, which is the same thing, in discovering the Uniformity there is in the production of na...
Folksonomies: naturalism induction
Folksonomies: naturalism induction
  1  notes

Induction studies nature and finds laws that produce natural effects for anyone to see, philosophy pretends to account for the appearances of natural effects.

11 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Newton's Discovery of Gravity as an Example of Induction ...

All the knowledge we possess of external objects is founded upon experience, which furnishes facts; and the comparison of these facts establishes relations, from which induction, the intuitive belief that like causes will produce like effects, leads to general laws. Thus, experience teaches that bodies fall at the surface of the earth with an accelerated velocity, and with a force proportional to their masses. By comparison, Newton proved that the force which occasions the fall of bodies at t...
  1  notes

He extended the force pulling everything down to the Earth out to the Moon, then to the Sun, and then the planets to see how our solar system really works.

14 SEP 2011 by ideonexus

 The Problem of Induction

It is time, therefore, to abandon the superstition that natural science cannot be regarded as logically respectable until philosophers have solved the problem of induction. The problem of induction is, roughly speaking, the problem of finding a way to prove that certain empirical generalizations which are derived from past experience will hold good also in the future.
  1  notes

Is not a problem if we accept empirical generalizations from past experiences as continuing to prove true in the future.