30 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 The Illusion of Taste

When carbon (C), Oxygen (o) and hydrogen (H) atoms bond in a certain way to form sugar, the resulting compound has a sweet taste. The sweetness resides neither in the C, nor in the O, nor in the H; it resides in the pattern that emerges from their interaction. It is an emergent property. Moreover, strictly speaking, is not a property of the chemical bonds. It is a sensory experience that arises when the sugar molecules interact with the chemistry of our taste buds, which in turns causes a set...
  1  notes

When we taste sweetness, our tongues are not responding to the C, O, or H, but to the molecule.

02 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Herschel Sees Spirituality in Science

To the natural philosopher there is no natural object unimportant or trifling … A mind that has once imbibed a taste for scientific enquiry has within itself an inexhaustible source of pure and exciting contemplations. One would think that Shakespeare had such a mind in view when he describes a contemplative man finding Tongues in trees — books in the running brooks Sermons in stones — and good in everything Where the uninformed and unenquiring eye perceives neither novelty nor beau...
Folksonomies: philosophy naturalism
Folksonomies: philosophy naturalism
  1  notes

Everything in nature is interesting and significant.

01 JAN 2012 by ideonexus

 Knowledge Changes Perspectives

We shall not cease from exploration And the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time… When the tongues of flame are in-folded Into the crowned knot of fire And the fire and the rose are one.
Folksonomies: exploration
Folksonomies: exploration
  1  notes

The things we learn along the path of life makes us see familiar things as if they are new.

19 MAY 2011 by ideonexus

 The Term "Higher Animals"

So glibly do the phrases 'higher animals' and 'lower animals' trip off our tongues that it comes as a shock to realize that, far from effortlessly slotting into evolutionary thinking as one might suppose, they were - and are - deeply antithetical to it. We think we know that chimpanzees are higher animals and earthworms are lower, we think we've always known what that means, and we think evolution makes it even clearer. But it doesn't. It is by no means clear that it means anything at all. Or...
  1  notes

Is meaningless and confuses people.