Skepticism is Not Enough

As I've tried to stress, at the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes - an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive, and the most ruthlessly sceptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new. This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. The collective enterprise of creative thinking and sceptical thinking, working together, keeps the field on track. Those two seemingly contradictory attitudes are, though, in some tension.

Consider this claim: as I walk along, time - as measured by my wristwatch or my ageing process - slows down. Also, I shrink in the direction of motion. Also, I get more massive. Who has ever witnessed such a thing? It's easy to dismiss it out of hand. Here's another: matter and antimatter are all the time, throughout the universe, being created from nothing. Here's a third: once in a very great while, your car will spontaneously ooze through the brick wall of your garage and be found the next morning on the street. They're all absurd! But the first is a statement of special relativity, and the other two are consequences of quantum mechanics (vacuum fluctuations and barrier tunnelling,* they're called). Like it or not, that's the way the world is. If you insist it's ridiculous, you'll be forever closed to some of the major findings on the rules that govern the Universe.

If you're only sceptical, then no new ideas make it through to you. You never learn anything. You become a crochety misanthrope convinced that nonsense is ruling the world. (There is, of course, much data to support you.) Since major discoveries in the borderlines of science are rare, experience will tend to confirm your grumpiness. But every now and then a new idea turns out to be on the mark, valid and wonderful. If you're too resolutely and uncompromisingly sceptical, you're going to miss (or resent) the transforming discoveries in science, and either way you will be obstructing understanding and progress. Mere scepticism is not enough.

Notes:

We must also be open to new and challenging ideas.

Folksonomies: science openness iconoclasm

Taxonomies:
/science/phyiscs/atomic physics (0.538082)
/science/social science/philosophy (0.526085)
/business and industrial (0.447473)

Keywords:
ruthlessly sceptical scrutiny (0.936455 (negative:-0.613691)), contradictory attitudes (0.873561 (positive:0.339111)), seemingly contradictory attitudes (0.869858 (positive:0.567023)), new ideas (0.753989 (negative:-0.203837)), sceptical thinking (0.684682 (negative:-0.692747)), challenging ideas (0.553960 (negative:-0.819318)), deep nonsense (0.551179 (neutral:0.000000)), Mere scepticism (0.536914 (negative:-0.790607)), deep truths (0.529672 (neutral:0.000000)), creative thinking (0.527671 (negative:-0.692747)), collective enterprise (0.524372 (negative:-0.692747)), crochety misanthrope (0.524227 (negative:-0.247341)), barrier tunnelling (0.518666 (negative:-0.240225)), vacuum fluctuations (0.517552 (negative:-0.240225)), brick wall (0.507135 (neutral:0.000000)), major discoveries (0.497606 (neutral:0.000000)), major findings (0.497515 (negative:-0.425141)), new idea (0.484434 (neutral:0.000000)), science (0.367655 (positive:0.471852)), matter (0.338409 (negative:-0.428587)), time (0.320585 (neutral:0.000000)), world (0.312640 (positive:0.325583)), way (0.311974 (positive:0.222947)), wristwatch (0.293602 (negative:-0.524913)), openness (0.288513 (positive:0.440397)), Skepticism (0.280523 (negative:-0.819318)), borderlines (0.279374 (neutral:0.000000)), antimatter (0.277329 (neutral:0.000000)), heart (0.266647 (positive:0.471852)), tension (0.262492 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Universe (0.974196): dbpedia | freebase
Physics (0.825130): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Skepticism (0.797777): dbpedia | freebase
Idea (0.792437): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
General relativity (0.769571): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Philosophical skepticism (0.744977): dbpedia | freebase
Time (0.742596): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Quark (0.687823): dbpedia | freebase

 The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Books, Brochures, and Chapters>Book:  Sagan , Carl and Druyan , Ann (1997-02-25), The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Ballantine Books, Retrieved on 2011-05-04
Folksonomies: science empiricism rationalism


Schemas

03 APR 2011

 Empiricism

Memes on seeing the world as it really is.
 14