Bias in Praise VS Punishment and Reversion to the Mean

I had the most satisfying Eureka experience of my career while attempting to teach flight instructors that praise is more effective than punishment for promoting skill-learning. When I had finished my enthusiastic speech, one of the most seasoned instructors in the audience raised his hand and made his own short speech, which began by conceding that positive reinforcement might be good for the birds, but went on to deny that it was optimal for flight cadets. He said, “On many occasions I have praised flight cadets for clean execution of some aerobatic maneuver, and in general when they try it again, they do worse. On the other hand, I have often screamed at cadets for bad execution, and in general they do better the next time. So please don't tell us that reinforcement works and punishment does not, because the opposite is the case.” This was a joyous moment, in which I understood an important truth about the world: because we tend to reward others when they do well and punish them when they do badly, and because there is regression to the mean, it is part of the human condition that we are statistically punished for rewarding others and rewarded for punishing them.

Notes:

User Cortesoft has a good analogy for this:

"Flip 100 coins. Take the ones that 'failed' (landed tails) and scold them. Flip them again. Half improved! Praise the ones that got heads the first time. Flip them again. Half got worse :(

"Clearly, scolding is more effective than praising."

(source)

See also Regression Fallacy

Folksonomies: bias reversion to the mean statistical bias regression fallacy

Taxonomies:
/pets/dogs (0.594168)
/hobbies and interests/collecting/stamps and coins (0.499872)
/law, govt and politics/government/heads of state (0.499023)

Keywords:
Praise VS Punishment (0.908336 (:0.000000)), Mean User Cortesoft (0.800489 (:0.000000)), satisfying Eureka experience (0.705381 (:0.000000)), flight cadets (0.666484 (:0.000000)), good analogy (0.434797 (:0.000000)), Regression Fallacy (0.423022 (:0.000000)), aerobatic maneuver (0.396391 (:0.000000)), joyous moment (0.391390 (:0.000000)), bad execution (0.373767 (:0.000000)), seasoned instructors (0.372021 (:0.000000)), positive reinforcement (0.369124 (:0.000000)), reinforcement works (0.367680 (:0.000000)), enthusiastic speech (0.363744 (:0.000000)), clean execution (0.363707 (:0.000000)), important truth (0.349653 (:0.000000)), human condition (0.347558 (:0.000000)), flight instructors (0.342966 (:0.000000)), short speech (0.342737 (:0.000000))

Concepts:
Reinforcement (0.920785): dbpedia_resource
Operant conditioning (0.869513): dbpedia_resource
Punishment (0.824641): dbpedia_resource
Praise (0.809318): dbpedia_resource
Reward system (0.789211): dbpedia_resource
Statistics (0.751247): dbpedia_resource
Core issues in ethics (0.727188): dbpedia_resource
Prison (0.688498): dbpedia_resource

 Quotation: Kahneman on Contingencies
Periodicals>Journal Article:  Kahneman, Daniel (2003), Quotation: Kahneman on Contingencies, Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2002, Retrieved on 2018-02-09
  • Source Material [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
  • Folksonomies: statistics bias