The Scientific is Sacred Because Truth is Sacred
Why do we separate the scientific, which is just a way of searching for truth, from what we hold sacred, which are those truths that inspire love and awe? Science is nothing more than a never-ending search for truth. What could be more profoundly sacred than that? I'm sure most of what we all hold dearest and cherish most, believing at this very moment, will be revealed at some future time to be merely a product of our age and our history and our understanding of reality. So here’s this process, this way, this mechanism for finding bits of reality. No single bit is sacred. But the search is.
Notes:
Folksonomies: science spirituality truth sacred
Taxonomies:
/science (0.586970)
/science/ecology/waste management/recycling (0.449189)
/religion and spirituality/christianity (0.316341)
Keywords:
Sacred Because Truth (0.911229 (positive:0.604597)), never-ending search (0.910758 (negative:-0.785501)), single bit (0.826972 (neutral:0.000000)), future time (0.791016 (positive:0.661796)), reality (0.436390 (positive:0.661796)), way (0.348959 (positive:0.464371)), dearest (0.279828 (positive:0.678031)), truths (0.266058 (positive:0.681149)), moment (0.225761 (positive:0.275847)), mechanism (0.205702 (neutral:0.000000)), bits (0.201462 (neutral:0.000000))
Concepts:
Fact (0.978193): dbpedia | freebase
Theory (0.963575): dbpedia | freebase
Religion (0.881829): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Truth (0.815850): dbpedia | freebase
Bit (0.810810): dbpedia | freebase
Reality (0.784691): dbpedia | freebase
Searching (0.730350): dbpedia
Epistemology (0.702278): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc