The Loser in an Argument is Actually the Winner

He explains, “Suppose you and I have an argument. You believe a proposition, P, and I don’t. I’ve objected, I’ve questioned, I’ve raised all sorts of counter-considerations, and in every case you’ve responded to my satisfaction. At the end of the day, I say, ‘You know what? I guess you’re right.’ So I have a new belief. And it’s not just any belief, but it’s a well-articulated, examined and battle-tested belief. Cohen continues, “So who won that argument? Well, the war metaphor seems to force us into saying you won, even though I’m the only one who made any cognitive gain.

Notes:

The problem with the "war" metaphor for debate is that it defines winning as failing to adjust one's position at the end, while the "loser," the one who has conceded points based on the evidence, comes away from the encounter with a much stronger and tested understanding of the subjectmatter.

Folksonomies: cognition debate

Taxonomies:
/religion and spirituality/atheism and agnosticism (0.631023)
/religion and spirituality/alternative religions/pagan and wiccan (0.409134)
/hobbies and interests/astrology (0.224753)

Keywords:
battle-tested belief (0.989608 (neutral:0.000000)), Winner The problem (0.981306 (neutral:0.000000)), argument (0.931692 (positive:0.476068)), new belief (0.925195 (neutral:0.000000)), cognitive gain (0.840385 (negative:-0.373302)), war metaphor (0.826156 (negative:-0.354216)), end (0.451438 (negative:-0.448435)), Loser (0.405535 (neutral:0.000000)), proposition (0.335604 (positive:0.279847)), encounter (0.313838 (positive:0.483319)), debate (0.300364 (negative:-0.448435)), sorts (0.297939 (negative:-0.254894)), position (0.294563 (negative:-0.448435)), satisfaction (0.290758 (positive:0.355474)), evidence (0.287881 (neutral:0.000000)), Cohen (0.276776 (neutral:0.000000)), points (0.274519 (neutral:0.000000)), understanding (0.272798 (positive:0.483319)), subjectmatter (0.272494 (positive:0.483319)), n’t (0.266464 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
Cohen:Person (0.878646 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
English-language films (0.983692): dbpedia
Logic (0.720528): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Debut albums (0.597001): dbpedia
Critical thinking (0.589144): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
2005 albums (0.576191): dbpedia
2001 albums (0.571843): dbpedia
The Encounter (0.533278): dbpedia | freebase | yago
2003 singles (0.525719): dbpedia

 Argument: When losing is winning
Electronic/World Wide Web>Internet Article:  Kent, Leo and Cohen, Daniel H. (1st September 2013), Argument: When losing is winning, Humans Invent, Retrieved on 2013-10-22
  • Source Material [www.humansinvent.com]
  • Folksonomies: debate argument


    Schemas

    09 JUL 2013

     Examples of Great Arguments and Rhetoric

    These quotes must be generalized enough to apply to a variety of situations.
    Folksonomies: rhetoric debate
    Folksonomies: rhetoric debate
     7