How Giving Nouns Genders Affects Thought

In Spanish and other Romance languages, nouns are either masculine or feminine. In many other languages, nouns are divided into many more genders ("gender" in this context meaning class or kind). For example, some Australian Aboriginal languages have up to sixteen genders, including classes of hunting weapons, canines, things that are shiny, or, in the phrase made famous by cognitive linguist George Lakoff, "women, fire, and dangerous things."

What it means for a language to have grammatical gender is that words belonging to different genders get treated differently grammatically and words belonging to the same grammatical gender get treated the same grammatically. Languages can require speakers to change pronouns, adjective and verb endings, possessives, numerals, and so on, depending on the noun's gender. For example, to say something like "my chair was old" in Russian (moy stul bil' stariy), you'd need to make every word in the sentence agree in gender with "chair" (stul), which is masculine in Russian. So you'd use the masculine form of "my," "was," and "old." These are the same forms you'd use in speaking of a biological male, as in "my grandfather was old." If, instead of speaking of a chair, you were speaking of a bed (krovat'), which is feminine in Russian, or about your grandmother, you would use the feminine form of "my," "was," and "old."

Does treating chairs as masculine and beds as feminine in the grammar make Russian speakers think of chairs as being more like men and beds as more like women in some way? It turns out that it does. In one study, we asked German and Spanish speakers to describe objects having opposite gender assignment in those two languages. The descriptions they gave differed in a way predicted by grammatical gender. For example, when asked to describe a "key" — a word that is masculine in German and feminine in Spanish — the German speakers were more likely to use words like "hard," "heavy," "jagged," "metal," "serrated," and "useful," whereas Spanish speakers were more likely to say "golden," "intricate," "little," "lovely," "shiny," and "tiny." To describe a "bridge," which is feminine in German and masculine in Spanish, the German speakers said "beautiful," "elegant," "fragile," "peaceful," "pretty," and "slender," and the Spanish speakers said "big," "dangerous," "long," "strong," "sturdy," and "towering." This was true even though all testing was done in English, a language without grammatical gender. The same pattern of results also emerged in entirely nonlinguistic tasks (e.g., rating similarity between pictures). And we can also show that it is aspects of language per se that shape how people think: teaching English speakers new grammatical gender systems influences mental representations of objects in the same way it does with German and Spanish speakers. Apparently even small flukes of grammar, like the seemingly arbitrary assignment of gender to a noun, can have an effect on people's ideas of concrete objects in the world.7

Notes:

Spanish, German, French, and Russian languages attribute genders to all nouns, and this has a profound affect on the way the speakers perceive the world.

Folksonomies: cognition language

Taxonomies:
/art and entertainment/books and literature (0.413608)
/science/social science/linguistics (0.373787)
/home and garden/home furnishings/sofas and chairs (0.321962)

Keywords:
grammatical gender (0.954879 (negative:-0.316296)), Spanish speakers (0.804730 (neutral:0.000000)), Nouns Genders Affects (0.800690 (neutral:0.000000)), new grammatical gender (0.759019 (neutral:0.000000)), opposite gender assignment (0.741419 (neutral:0.000000)), linguist George Lakoff (0.704114 (neutral:0.000000)), Australian Aboriginal languages (0.698905 (neutral:0.000000)), moy stul bil (0.695921 (neutral:0.000000)), context meaning class (0.695039 (negative:-0.308968)), teaching English speakers (0.679067 (neutral:0.000000)), seemingly arbitrary assignment (0.676613 (negative:-0.432756)), masculine form (0.670750 (neutral:0.000000)), entirely nonlinguistic tasks (0.664225 (neutral:0.000000)), different genders (0.652054 (negative:-0.284189)), German speakers (0.648862 (neutral:0.000000)), feminine form (0.642207 (neutral:0.000000)), Thought Spanish (0.620132 (neutral:0.000000)), Russian languages (0.619442 (neutral:0.000000)), Romance languages (0.618689 (neutral:0.000000)), profound affect (0.617603 (positive:0.496257)), verb endings (0.608582 (negative:-0.325902)), Russian speakers (0.608199 (positive:0.819987)), hunting weapons (0.605445 (neutral:0.000000)), dangerous things (0.604143 (negative:-0.319357)), biological male (0.602804 (neutral:0.000000)), (krovat'), which is feminine in Russian, or about your grandmother, you would use the feminine form of ``my,'' ``was,'' and ``old.'' (0.601730 (neutral:0.000000)), small flukes (0.598111 (negative:-0.648316)), mental representations (0.594685 (neutral:0.000000)), rating similarity (0.593037 (negative:-0.255834)), concrete objects (0.591105 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
George Lakoff:Person (0.764863 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Latin (0.964961): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Grammatical gender (0.900998): dbpedia | freebase
German language (0.884339): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Gender (0.832162): dbpedia | freebase
Spanish language (0.821886): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Inflection (0.818779): dbpedia | freebase
English language (0.809347): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Romance languages (0.745959): dbpedia | freebase | yago

 How Does Our Language Shape the Way We Think?
Electronic/World Wide Web>Internet Article:  Boroditsky, Lera (6.12.09), How Does Our Language Shape the Way We Think?, Edge, Retrieved on 2013-04-26
  • Source Material [www.edge.org]
  • Folksonomies: culture cognition language