Taxonomy as Colonial Imperialism
Coleridge pointed to this difference between an organising taxonomy and a dynamic scientific principle or law in essays in The Friend (1819). The psychology of collecting, ordering and naming specimens could also be seen as a form of mental colonising and empire-building. ‘Taxonomy after all, is a form of imperialism. During the nineteenth century, when British naval surveys were flooding London with specimens to be classified, inserting them in their proper niches in the Linnaean hierarchy, had undeniable political overtones. Take a bird or a lizard or a flower from Patagonia or the South Seas, perhaps one that had had a local name for centuries, rechristen it with a Latin binomial, and presto! It had become a tiny British colony.’ Anne Fadiman, ‘Collecting Nature’, in At Large and at Small (2007), p.19.
Richard Holmes, The Age of Wonder (2010-03-02)
Notes
British scientists renaming species that were already named by the native inhabitants of the colonies as a form of oppression.
References
- The Age of Wonder Book
Schemas
Not in any schema.
Triples
Not related to other memes yet.
Watson’s reading
Tags generated by IBM Watson from the text. Percentages are its confidence.
Categories
- society racism 58%
- science biology zoology ornithology 35%
- travel transports air travel airlines 32%
People, places and things
- Coleridge Person
- Anne Fadiman Person
- South Seas Geographic Feature
- At Large Geographic Feature
- London City
Concepts
Keywords
Colonial Imperialism British, undeniable political overtones, dynamic scientific principle, British naval surveys, tiny British colony., ’ Anne Fadiman, ‘Collecting Nature’, in At Large and at Small (2007), p.19., Linnaean hierarchy, organising taxonomy, native inhabitants, proper niches, nineteenth century, mental colonising
6 more keywords
South Seas, specimens, form, empire-building, oppression, Coleridge