The English Alphabet will Become Like Chinese as We Lose Phonetic Spelling

i ui iu to knsider is Alfabet, and giv mi Instanses f st Ili Urds and Sunds az iu mee ink kannt perfektli bi eksprest bi it. i am persueeded it mee bi kmplited bi iur help. i greeter difiklti uil bi to bri it into ius. Huevr, if Amendments eer nevr atemted, and is kntinu to gro urs and urs, ee mst km to bi in a reted Kndin at last; st indiid i ink ur Alfabet and Riti lredi in; bt if ui go n az ui hev dn e fiu Senturiz lnger, ur urds uil graduali siis to ekspres Sunds, ee uil onli stand fr is, az i rittin urds du in i Tuiniiz Languad, huit i sspekt mit oridinali hev bin e litiral Riti lik at f Iurop, bt ru i Teendez in Pronsien brt n bi i Kors f Eedes, and ru i bstinet Adhirens f at Pipil to old Kstms and am rs to eer old manr ov Riti, i oridinal Sunds f Leters and Urds eer lst, and no lngr knsidered.

Translated:

I wish you to consider this Alphabet, and give me Instances of such English Words and Sounds as you may think can not perfectly be expressed by it. I am persuaded it may be completed by your help. The greater difficulty will be to bring it into use. However, if Amendments are never attempted and things continue to grow worse and worse they must come to be in a wretched Condition at last; such indeed I think our Alphabet and Writing already in; but if we go on as we have done a few Centuries longer, our words will gradually cease to express Sounds, they will only stand for things, as the written words do in the Chinese Language, which I suspect might originally have been a literal Writing like that of Europe, but through the Changes in Pronunciation brought on by the Course of Ages and through the obstinate Adherence of that People to old Customs, and among others to their old manner of Writing, the original Sounds of Letters and Words are lost, and no longer considered.

Notes:

If we fail to reform our spelling to maintain its phonetic value, words will become purely symbolic, like Chinese characters, no longer representing sounds and only communicating their semantic content.

Folksonomies: phonetics

Keywords:
kannt perfektli bi (0.932981 (positive:0.244719)), Sunds az iu (0.926090 (positive:0.244719)), az ui hev (0.849219 (neutral:0.000000)), uil onli stand (0.813905 (neutral:0.000000)), st Ili Urds (0.780040 (positive:0.244719)), ee mst km (0.757327 (neutral:0.000000)), brt n bi (0.755648 (neutral:0.000000)), litiral Riti lik (0.744955 (neutral:0.000000)), giv mi Instanses (0.744147 (positive:0.244719)), Urds eer lst (0.743977 (neutral:0.000000)), old manr ov (0.739070 (neutral:0.000000)), fiu Senturiz lnger (0.734086 (neutral:0.000000)), ekspres Sunds (0.679028 (neutral:0.000000)), Sunds f Leters (0.674077 (neutral:0.000000)), ur Alfabet (0.665617 (neutral:0.000000)), bt ru (0.633670 (neutral:0.000000)), iur help. (0.614612 (positive:0.244719)), ur urds (0.613582 (neutral:0.000000)), Kors f Eedes (0.592116 (neutral:0.000000)), obstinate Adherence (0.589062 (neutral:0.000000)), wretched Condition (0.581356 (neutral:0.000000)), old Kstms (0.580498 (neutral:0.000000)), English Words (0.579941 (neutral:0.000000)), Riti lredi (0.578794 (neutral:0.000000)), written words (0.574099 (neutral:0.000000)), Tuiniiz Languad (0.572904 (neutral:0.000000)), lngr knsidered. (0.570123 (neutral:0.000000)), mit oridinali (0.567921 (neutral:0.000000)), literal Writing (0.566763 (neutral:0.000000)), original Sounds (0.566229 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Trigraph (0.912780): dbpedia | freebase
Gh (0.826333): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Chinese language (0.772455): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Chinese character (0.724377): website | dbpedia | opencyc | yago
Alphabet (0.636171): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
China (0.631718): geo | dbpedia | ciaFactbook | freebase
Writing (0.540971): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

 "Benjamin Franklin to Mary Stevenson" Papers of Benjamin Franklin
Periodicals>Journal Article:  Franklin, Benjamin (Jul 20, 1768), "Benjamin Franklin to Mary Stevenson" Papers of Benjamin Franklin, Yale University Press, vol. 15, 173b, Retrieved on 2010-11-30
Folksonomies: phonetics


Triples

13 OCT 2013

 Strength and Weakness of Chinese Ideograms

The English Alphabet will Become Like Chinese as We Lose Phonetic Spelling > Contrast > The Power of the Chinese Ideogram
Franklin saw their decoupling from phonetics as a weakness, but Russel saw it as a strength.


Schemas

31 DEC 2010

 Arguments for English Spelling Reform

This schema is a collection of arguments about how proper grammar, with its illogical and inconsistently applied rules, is used by academics and intellectuals to create a privileged class of people who's ideas deserve considering because they have successfully learned the irrational system.
Folksonomies: phonetics grammar
Folksonomies: phonetics grammar
 38