Philosophy Does Not Inflame Passion as Religion Does
Besides, we must not be apprehensive that any philosophical opinion will ever harm the religion of a country. Though our demonstrations clash directly with our mysteries, that is nothing to the purpose, for the latter are not less revered upon that account by our Christian philosophers, who know very well that the objects of reason and those of faith are of a very different nature. Philosophers will never form a religious sect, the reason of which is, their writings are not calculated for the common people, and they themselves are free from enthusiasm. If we divide mankind into twenty parts, it will be found that nineteen of these consist of persons employed in manual labor, who will never know that such a man as Mr. Locke existed. In the remaining twentieth part how few are readers? And among such as are so, twenty amuse themselves with romances to one who studies philosophy. The thinking part of mankind is confined to a very small number, and these will never disturb the peace and tranquillity of the world.
Neither Montaigne, Locke, Bayle, Spinoza, Hobbes, Lord Shaftesbury, Collins, nor Toland, lighted up the firebrand of discord in their countries; this has generally been the work of divines, who being at first puffed up with the ambition of becoming chiefs of a sect, grew very desirous of being the head of a party. But what do I say? All the works of the modem philosophers put together will never raise so much commotion as did the dispute among the Franciscans, over the form of their sleeves and cowls.
Notes:
Folksonomies: enlightenment religion
Taxonomies:
/religion and spirituality (0.931506)
/religion and spirituality/christianity (0.807909)
Concepts:
Philosophy (0.985347): dbpedia_resource
Faith (0.704631): dbpedia_resource
Religion (0.646461): dbpedia_resource
Plato (0.582064): dbpedia_resource
God (0.568651): dbpedia_resource
Belief (0.534598): dbpedia_resource
Avicenna (0.533797): dbpedia_resource
Epistemology (0.490368): dbpedia_resource