Ikigai and Mortality

Among the 43,391 subjects enrolled, 25,596 (59.0%) indicated that they found a sense of ikigai, 15,782 (36.4%) indicated they were uncertain, and 2013 (4.6%) indicated they did not find a sense of ikigai. As compared with those who found a sense of ikigai, those who did not were more likely to be unmarried, unemployed, have a lower educational level, have bad or poor self-rated health, have a high level of perceived mental stress, have severe or moderate bodily pain, have limitation of physical function, and less likely to walk (Table 1).

The Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that those who did not find a sense of ikigai were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (p < .001) (Figure 1). Table 2 shows the HR (95% CI) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to the response categories for ikigai. There was a statistically significant association between ikigai and the risk of all-cause mortality. As compared with subjects who found a sense of ikigai, the multivariate adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause mortality was 1.1 (1.0 –1.2) for those who were uncertain, and 1.5 (1.3–1.7) for those who did not find a sense of ikigai. This finding remained basically unchanged even after excluding the deaths that occurred within the first 2 years of follow-up.

Notes:

Folksonomies: mortality longevity

Taxonomies:
/art and entertainment/humor (0.474546)
/health and fitness/disease/heart disease (0.420765)
/health and fitness/disease (0.272810)

Keywords:
all-cause mortality (0.996097 (neutral:0.000000)), ikigai (0.876968 (negative:-0.228121)), sense (0.841298 (positive:0.018324)), moderate bodily pain (0.807506 (negative:-0.771268)), lower educational level (0.769265 (negative:-0.722173)), statistically significant association (0.756652 (neutral:0.000000)), multivariate adjusted HR (0.743598 (neutral:0.000000)), cause-specific mortality (0.575507 (neutral:0.000000)), mental stress (0.529534 (negative:-0.761139)), physical function (0.528628 (negative:-0.478386)), Kaplan-Meier curves (0.526632 (neutral:0.000000)), response categories (0.509419 (neutral:0.000000)), high level (0.508168 (negative:-0.761139)), subjects (0.357463 (positive:0.246445)), Table (0.351653 (neutral:0.000000)), risk (0.347480 (neutral:0.000000)), limitation (0.290039 (negative:-0.478386)), follow-up (0.275046 (negative:-0.504738)), deaths (0.275027 (negative:-0.504738))

Entities:
95%:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000)), 2 years:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000)), 36.4%:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000)), 59.0%:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000)), 4.6%:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Statistics (0.909010): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Death (0.832835): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Stress (0.780186): dbpedia | freebase
Statistical significance (0.761247): dbpedia | freebase
Risk (0.747038): dbpedia | freebase
Actuarial science (0.746802): dbpedia | freebase

 Sense of Life Worth Living (Ikigai) and Mortality in Japan: Ohsaki Study
Periodicals>Journal Article:  Sone, Nakaya, Ohmori, Shimazu, Higashiguchi, Kakizaki, Kikuchi, Kuriyama, Tsuji (2008), Sense of Life Worth Living (Ikigai) and Mortality in Japan: Ohsaki Study, Psychosomatic Medicine, 70 (6): 709–715, Retrieved on 2016-09-02
Folksonomies: well being


Schemas

04 MAR 2015

 Longevity

How to live longer.
 29