Does the Universe have a Purpose?

Anyone who expresses a more definitive response to the question is claiming access to knowledge not based on empirical foundations. This remarkably persistent way of thinking, common to most religions and some branches of philosophy, has failed badly in past efforts to understand, and thereby predict the operations of the universe and our place within it.

To assert that the universe has a purpose implies the universe has intent. And intent implies a desired outcome. But who would do the desiring? And what would a desired outcome be? That carbon-based life is inevitable? Or that sentient primates are life's neurological pinnacle? Are answers to these questions even possible without expressing a profound bias of human sentiment? Of course humans were not around to ask these questions for 99.9999% of cosmic history. So if the purpose of the universe was to create humans then the cosmos was embarrassingly inefficient about it.

And if a further purpose of the universe was to create a fertile cradle for life, then our cosmic environment has got an odd way of showing it. Life on Earth, during more than 3.5 billion years of existence, has been persistently assaulted by natural sources of mayhem, death, and destruction. Ecological devastation exacted by volcanoes, climate change, earthquakes, tsunamis, storms, pestilence, and especially killer asteroids have left extinct 99.9% of all species that have ever lived here.

How about human life itself? If you are religious, you might declare that the purpose of life is to serve God. But if you're one of the 100 billion bacteria living and working in a single centimeter of our lower intestine (rivaling, by the way, the total number of humans who have ever been born) you would give an entirely different answer. You might instead say that the purpose of human life is to provide you with a dark, but idyllic, anaerobic habitat of fecal matter.

So in the absence of human hubris, and after we filter out the delusional assessments it promotes within us, the universe looks more and more random. Whenever events that are purported to occur in our best interest are as numerous as other events that would just as soon kill us, then intent is hard, if not impossible, to assert. So while I cannot claim to know for sure whether or not the universe has a purpose, the case against it is strong, and visible to anyone who sees the universe as it is rather than as they wish it to be.

Notes:

If it does, it's difficult to see what that purpose would be in light of what we see around us.

Folksonomies: meaning purpose perspective

Taxonomies:
/science/phyiscs/atomic physics (0.574207)
/health and fitness/disorders (0.447352)
/law, govt and politics/legal issues/death penalty (0.446822)

Keywords:
remarkably persistent way (0.971397 (negative:-0.301658)), universe (0.966055 (negative:-0.297045)), purpose (0.922184 (negative:-0.072660)), especially killer asteroids (0.907649 (neutral:0.000000)), entirely different answer (0.886128 (neutral:0.000000)), human life (0.865891 (negative:-0.232983)), carbon-based life (0.732520 (negative:-0.402386)), definitive response (0.730956 (positive:0.279461)), empirical foundations (0.725929 (positive:0.279461)), sentient primates (0.717318 (neutral:0.000000)), profound bias (0.705992 (neutral:0.000000)), past efforts (0.701621 (negative:-0.538609)), fertile cradle (0.700167 (positive:0.405261)), single centimeter (0.693819 (negative:-0.431497)), cosmic history (0.690807 (neutral:0.000000)), human sentiment (0.690481 (neutral:0.000000)), delusional assessments (0.689794 (neutral:0.000000)), human hubris (0.688469 (negative:-0.552777)), Ecological devastation (0.686373 (negative:-0.479551)), cosmic environment (0.685436 (neutral:0.000000)), natural sources (0.682615 (neutral:0.000000)), fecal matter (0.676161 (neutral:0.000000)), anaerobic habitat (0.674799 (neutral:0.000000)), climate change (0.674016 (negative:-0.326434)), odd way (0.671764 (neutral:0.000000)), total number (0.671184 (neutral:0.000000)), humans (0.598579 (negative:-0.680365)), outcome (0.552045 (negative:-0.489276)), intent (0.548008 (negative:-0.604485)), questions (0.501216 (neutral:0.000000))

Entities:
climate change:FieldTerminology (0.687057 (negative:-0.326434)), 3.5 billion years:Quantity (0.687057 (neutral:0.000000)), 99.9999%:Quantity (0.687057 (neutral:0.000000)), 99.9%:Quantity (0.687057 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Life (0.987585): dbpedia | freebase
Meaning of life (0.747139): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Human (0.704549): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Universe (0.510316): dbpedia | freebase
Religion (0.484831): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Sentence (0.480845): dbpedia | freebase | yago
Nature (0.440780): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Earth (0.439367): dbpedia | freebase

 Does the Universe Have a Purpose?
Proceedings of Meetings and Symposia>Speech:  Tyson, Neil deGrasse , Does the Universe Have a Purpose?, Templeton Foundation, Retrieved on 2013-08-07
  • Source Material [www.templeton.org]
  • Folksonomies: science religion purpose