Dunning–Kruger effect
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.
Notes:
People who are unskilled in domains grossly overestimate their abilities compared to those who are skilled.
Folksonomies: knowledge wisdom ignorance
Keywords:
overly favorable views (0.930037 (negative:-0.658484)), intellectual domains (0.806273 (negative:-0.658484)), erroneous conclusions (0.784341 (negative:-0.574295)), Dunning–Kruger effect (0.776228 (negative:-0.635823)), unfortunate choices (0.769815 (negative:-0.791349)), 12th percentile (0.769328 (neutral:0.000000)), dual burden (0.768762 (negative:-0.732256)), metacognitive ability (0.726390 (negative:-0.727595)), metacognitive competence (0.723539 (positive:0.405977)), test scores (0.721531 (neutral:0.000000)), test performance (0.716992 (negative:-0.684584)), abilities (0.714337 (negative:-0.652855)), people (0.711172 (negative:-0.598701)), metacognitive skill (0.707090 (negative:-0.398724)), participants (0.613888 (positive:0.739340)), authors (0.591967 (negative:-0.413887)), incompetence (0.573667 (negative:-0.727595)), 62nd (0.569322 (neutral:0.000000)), deficits (0.563458 (negative:-0.398724)), limitations (0.556599 (negative:-0.664258)), accuracy (0.549356 (negative:-0.408693)), error (0.547762 (negative:-0.408693)), analyses (0.547391 (neutral:0.000000)), overestimation (0.547259 (negative:-0.413888)), capacity (0.545431 (negative:-0.408693)), grammar (0.545193 (negative:-0.244019)), studies (0.543344 (neutral:0.000000)), miscalibration (0.543009 (neutral:0.000000)), tests (0.542993 (neutral:0.000000))
Concepts:
Skill (0.968467): dbpedia | freebase
Competence (0.866394): dbpedia
Critical thinking (0.828633): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Triples
Ignorance Begets Confidence
Ignorance Begets Confidence > Additional Support/Evidence > Dunning–Kruger effectDarwin said it, Dunning-Kruger proved it.
Handling Dunning-Kruger
Dunning–Kruger effect > Conclusion > Handling Self DoubtHow does one deal with the self-doubt that comes with knowing just how much you don't know?