Darwin Considers Intermediaries Between Species
I have found it difficult, when looking at any two species, to avoid picturing to myself, forms directly intermediate between them. But this is a wholly false view; we should always look for forms intermediate between each species and a common but unknown progenitor; and the progenitor will generally have differed in some respects from all of its modified descendants.
Notes:
But recognizes that this line of thinking is misleading, because species have common ancestors that are something different from both their descendants.
Folksonomies: evolution missing links
Taxonomies:
/science/biology/zoology/endangered species (0.647252)
/health and fitness/therapy (0.449524)
/business and industrial/company/joint venture (0.423240)
Keywords:
Darwin Considers Intermediaries (0.944966 (negative:-0.457648)), wholly false view (0.805669 (neutral:0.000000)), unknown progenitor (0.614481 (neutral:0.000000)), common ancestors (0.536856 (positive:0.214052)), species (0.472565 (negative:-0.211598)), descendants (0.335922 (positive:0.349258)), forms (0.330010 (neutral:0.000000)), picturing (0.319459 (neutral:0.000000)), respects (0.308016 (neutral:0.000000)), thinking (0.293427 (negative:-0.457648))
Entities:
Darwin:OperatingSystem (0.896898 (negative:-0.457648))
Concepts:
Common descent (0.926989): dbpedia | freebase
Epistemology (0.607922): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Ancestor (0.560700): dbpedia | freebase
Charles Darwin (0.532553): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago