Most current-events-related conversations are just people talking out of their asses

“Because it helps you participate in everyday conversations!” is a weak but at least meaningful answer to the “What is accomplished” question. But when you quit playing the current events game, and observe others talking about them, you might notice that almost nobody really knows what they’re talking about.

There is an extraordinary gulf between having a functional understanding of an issue, and the cursory glance you get from the news. If you ever come across a water-cooler conversation on a topic you happen to know a lot about, you see right through the emperor’s clothes. It’s kind of hilarious how willing people are to speak boldly on issues they’ve known about for all of three hours.

It feels good to make cutting remarks and take hard stands, even when we’re wrong, and the news gives us perfect fodder for that. The less you know about an issue, the easier it is to make bold proclamations about it, because at newscast-distance it still looks black and white enough that you can feel certain about what needs to happen next.

Maybe the last thing the world needs is another debate on Issue X between two people who learned about it from a newscast—at least if we’re trying to improve relationships between people from different groups.

Notes:

Folksonomies: productivity current events prioritization

Taxonomies:
/law, govt and politics/legal issues (0.372231)
/science/physics/electromagnetism (0.340441)
/business and industrial/agriculture and forestry/crops and seed (0.333912)

Keywords:
current events game (0.900248 (neutral:0.000000)), everyday conversations (0.725615 (neutral:0.000000)), current-events-related conversations (0.723879 (negative:-0.274187)), cursory glance (0.717389 (negative:-0.389747)), meaningful answer (0.714053 (negative:-0.284803)), extraordinary gulf (0.682665 (positive:0.546017)), bold proclamations (0.678752 (positive:0.426305)), perfect fodder (0.670428 (positive:0.412103)), water-cooler conversation (0.670259 (neutral:0.000000)), functional understanding (0.669977 (positive:0.546017)), hard stands (0.651782 (negative:-0.543799)), different groups (0.646298 (negative:-0.626328)), people (0.597229 (positive:0.254768)), issue (0.548793 (negative:-0.080311)), news (0.505194 (positive:0.022356)), asses (0.488216 (negative:-0.274187)), remarks (0.461583 (negative:-0.543799)), question (0.460419 (neutral:0.000000)), clothes (0.457312 (neutral:0.000000)), kind (0.455841 (positive:0.763716)), emperor (0.455663 (neutral:0.000000)), thing (0.454366 (negative:-0.626328)), topic (0.452179 (neutral:0.000000)), issues (0.451982 (positive:0.763716)), debate (0.451822 (negative:-0.626328)), world (0.448996 (negative:-0.626328)), newscast—at (0.448612 (negative:-0.626328))

Entities:
three hours:Quantity (0.010000 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Knowledge (0.984520): dbpedia | freebase
Learning (0.661300): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

 Five Things You Notice When You Quit the News
Electronic/World Wide Web>Blog:  Cain, David (December 2016), Five Things You Notice When You Quit the News, Retrieved on 2016-12-29
  • Source Material [www.raptitude.com]
  • Folksonomies: productivity current events prioritization