Science and Democracy are Synergistic

The values of science and tha values of democracy are concordant, in many cases indistinguishable. Science confers power on anyone who takes the trouble to learn it. Science thrives on the free exchange of ideas; its values are antithetical to secrecy. Science holds to no special vantage points or privileged positions. Both science and democracy encourage unconventional opinions and vigorous debate. Both demand adeguate reason, coherent argument, rigorous standards of evidence and honesty. Science is a baloney detector, a way to call the bluff of those who only pretend to knowledge. The more widespread its language, rules, and methods, the better chance we have of preserving what Jefferson and his colleagues had in mind. But democracy can also be subverted more thoroughly with the tools of science than any pra-industrial demagogue ever dreamed

Notes:

The two concepts support one another.

Folksonomies: science democracy public policy

Taxonomies:
/science (0.793458)
/law, govt and politics/government (0.430183)
/health and fitness/exercise (0.316369)

Keywords:
demand adeguate reason (0.972778 (neutral:0.000000)), science (0.844885 (positive:0.111401)), tha values (0.801048 (positive:0.552024)), democracy (0.757551 (positive:0.588110)), Science confers (0.712541 (neutral:0.000000)), privileged positions (0.702457 (positive:0.222106)), baloney detector (0.688531 (negative:-0.515588)), vigorous debate (0.674257 (positive:0.914620)), special vantage (0.672976 (neutral:0.000000)), coherent argument (0.669683 (negative:-0.231843)), unconventional opinions (0.653491 (positive:0.914620)), rigorous standards (0.639060 (neutral:0.000000)), free exchange (0.626858 (positive:0.782164)), widespread its language (0.617142 (negative:-0.335134)), better chance (0.596172 (positive:0.595574)), pra-industrial demagogue (0.590733 (neutral:0.000000)), Synergistic (0.345674 (positive:0.701954)), thrives (0.344353 (positive:0.782164)), secrecy (0.331750 (neutral:0.000000)), honesty (0.315662 (positive:0.690560)), trouble (0.304799 (negative:-0.467739)), colleagues (0.302616 (neutral:0.000000)), bluff (0.299786 (neutral:0.000000)), cases (0.285224 (negative:-0.441295)), Jefferson (0.281883 (neutral:0.000000)), concepts (0.281867 (positive:0.701954)), power (0.278354 (negative:-0.467739)), evidence (0.276812 (positive:0.690560)), points (0.273328 (positive:0.222106)), ideas (0.272784 (positive:0.782164))

Entities:
coherent:OperatingSystem (0.828175 (negative:-0.231843)), Jefferson:Person (0.780061 (neutral:0.000000))

Concepts:
Epistemology (0.932787): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Logic (0.895684): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Critical thinking (0.881485): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Reason (0.766459): dbpedia | freebase
Idea (0.703179): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc
Knowledge (0.700593): dbpedia | freebase
Plato (0.647477): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc | yago
Cognition (0.611424): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

 Advocating science and hope : draft essay
Unpublished Work>Publication of Limited Circulation:  Sagan , Carl (1994), Advocating science and hope : draft essay, Retrieved on 2014-03-03
  • Source Material [www.loc.gov]
  • Folksonomies: science public policy


    Schemas

    01 JAN 2010

     Scientific Virtues

    Memes that define the virtues of science and behaviors that we should emulate.
     60